Browse: Home / In Name Only

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login

The-SoluteLogo

A Film Site By Lovers of Film

Menu

Skip to content
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Long Reviews
  • News
  • Articles and Opinions
  • Other Media
  • Disney Byways: Disney's Lawyers
  • The Solute Book Club: THE DAUGHTER OF TIME (by Casper)
  • The Friday Article Roundup: Plain as the Nose
  • SUPER MARIO BROS. 1993 and the Rise of Feminism: An Intersectional Femivision article by Cori Domschot
  • Miller's 2022 Double Features: Wake Up and Live, Eat Shit and Die
Yup, this is Calamity Jane

In Name Only

Posted By Gillianren on November 16, 2022 in Short Articles | Leave a response

Easily one of Doris Day’s weirdest movies is Calamity Jane. It’s not just that it is a strong contender to win the Queer Sensibilities of 1953 award. Jane has more chemistry with her female costar than her male one. She had to deliberately deepen her voice, because she herself said she sounded more like Minnie Mouse before she got the hang of things and a feel for the character. Considerably more relevant, though, is that the character of Calamity Jane has nothing to do with the historical figure. If you compare the two—and it’s hard not to, especially after Deadwood—you’re left with a deep sense of bewilderment.

It’s something I’ve become increasingly familiar with as I write more and more Camera Obscura articles. I’ll read a book and watch a movie and have absolutely no idea how the latter came from the former. Even if I like both. There’s a certain amount of change I expect—trimming subplots is fairly common, for starters, because you’re trying to make a two-hour movie out of a three hundred page book. Some of it’s got to go. But then you get Christmas at Candleshoe, where there is almost nothing in common from one to the other, and while I agree that “Candleshoe” is a cool name, I want to know the process of getting where we ended up.

I know people who argue that adaptations have no obligation to accuracy. I strongly disagree; my stance has long been that, if you’re doing an “in name only” adaptation, maybe just don’t. Especially if the property is obscure—you’re not drawing in extra names. Worse, though, are the ones that fundamentally misunderstand the point of the work. If your beloved work has a strong lesson about the importance of being yourself, it can be not merely frustrating but actively infuriating to see it turned into a celebration of conformity. No specific examples, here, but you know the sort of thing I’m talking about.

I won’t say there’s no excuse. The excuse is quite obvious. They’re doing it for the money. There are a lot of cases where the people who made the adaptation saw a property and thought, “Wow, that name will get a lot of tickets sold.” But they didn’t want to tell the story the book did, because they didn’t think that story was worth telling, or that it was too expensive, or that they couldn’t fit their chosen star into it. Can you imagine ‘50s Doris Day as the real Calamity Jane, leaving aside that Martha Jane Cannary spent time as a sex worker, which wouldn’t have made it in under the Code.

But it does make it frustrating as a viewer, and I, for one, tend to wait to watch things until after someone I know who knows the source material tells me if it’s worth it. Which is why I still haven’t seen Paddington—I am extremely familiar with the books and extremely familiar with children’s movies that get beloved properties very wrong indeed. I get that everyone loves the Paddington movies, but I am that annoying person who would be complaining about all the ways in which that isn’t Paddington.

You can, on the other hand, pay me to watch the movie by contributing to my Patreon or Ko-fi, if that’s the sort of thing you’d like to do!

Posted in Short Articles | Tagged Adaptations, in name only

About the Author

gillianmadeira@hotmail.com'

Gillianren

Gillianren is a forty-something bipolar woman living in the Pacific Northwest after growing up in Los Angeles County. She and her boyfriend have one son and one daughter, and she gave a daughter up for adoption. She fills her days by watching her local library system’s DVD collection in alphabetical order, watching everything that looks interesting. She particularly enjoys pre-Code films, blaxploitation, and live-action Disney movies of the ’60s and ’70s. She has a Patreon account at https://www.patreon.com/gillianren

Related Posts

"I'm a pilot! How crazy is that!"The Friday Article Roundup: Will That Fly?→

Superconductor. That's all I've got. I'm tired.The Friday Article Roundup: Personal Conductor→

A pointed contractFaust–You Know, For Kids→

Downey looking at another list of Oscar nominees.Taco Break: Mismatches and Yes! Matches (from Miller)→

  • Comments
  • Popular
  • Most Recent
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleWonderful piece, Sam. It's made…
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleFellow heretic here. I've never…
  • n***********@gmail.com'
    Ruck Cohlchez on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEI wouldn't have called it…
  • j***********@gmail.com'
    Son of Griff on LIFE ITSELFGlad to hear back from…
  • n*********@gmail.com'
    Jake Gittes on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEThis is the single most…
  • “The End” of SAVAGES

    33911 views / Posted November 10, 2014
  • What the fuck did I just watch? SPHERE

    27470 views / Posted March 19, 2015
  • The Untalented Mr. Ripley: The Craft of Standup Comedy and the Non-Comedy of TOM MYERS

    25110 views / Posted June 26, 2018
  • Scenic Routes: SHOWGIRLS (1995)

    20113 views / Posted November 20, 2014
  • Yvonne, or: CASABLANCA In One Character and Three Scenes

    11160 views / Posted August 21, 2014
  • Disney Byways: Disney’s Lawyers

    March 31, 2023 / Gillianren
  • The Solute Book Club: THE DAUGHTER OF TIME (by Casper)

    March 31, 2023 / The Ploughman
  • You've got something dangling... no the other...

    The Friday Article Roundup: Plain as the Nose

    March 31, 2023 / The Ploughman
  • A feminist icon?

    SUPER MARIO BROS. 1993 and the Rise of Feminism: An Intersectional Femivision article by Cori Domschot

    March 30, 2023 / Gillianren
  • Pet rocks dropped in popularity when H.R. Giger redesigned them.

    Miller’s 2022 Double Features: Wake Up and Live, Eat Shit and Die

    March 30, 2023 / The Ploughman

Last Tweets

  • Disney Byways: Disney’s Lawyers - https://t.co/9rI8TOYL9X, 5 hours ago
  • The Solute Book Club: Join us for a discussion on Josephine Tey's THE DAUGHTER OF TIME: https://t.co/XUHS1frzrf, 14 hours ago
  • The Friday Article Roundup: Plain as the Nose - https://t.co/tXiXDvwe4f, 17 hours ago

©2014 - 2016 The-Solute | Hosted, Developed and Maintained by Bellingham WP LogoBellinghamWP.com.

Menu

  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!