Browse: Home / Year of the Month: Belated Comebacker on MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login

The-SoluteLogo

A Film Site By Lovers of Film

Menu

Skip to content
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Long Reviews
  • News
  • Articles and Opinions
  • Other Media
  • Year of the Month: Haley Ioppini on PROCOL HARUM
  • Lunch Links: OUT
  • Choose
  • Year of the Month: Sunil Patel on THE DIRTY DOZEN
  • Film on the Internet: THE RENTAL

Year of the Month: Belated Comebacker on MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE

Posted By Sam "Burgundy Suit" Scott on January 18, 2021 in Features | Leave a response

The Mission: Impossible series may be at seven movies now and counting, with each installment offering bigger and braver set pieces, but the franchise has relatively modest origins. Instead of a plane to cling to or a skyscraper to scale, the first movie begins with a man watching a bulky CRT monitor in Kiev. On the screen, a panicky man in a stained undershirt speaks to an older, mustachioed guy who could be a former military man. On the bed, we see a woman in lingerie, apparently dead. But as the scene continues, it becomes clear the man is a mark, the woman is fine, and the technician is hunting for a name. Once they get it, their target is poisoned, and the walls of the apparent hotel room fall away, as does the older man’s face. Meet Ethan Hunt and his Impossible Mission Force, although with the amount of stagecraft on display, you’d be forgiven for assuming they were a film crew instead.

While that scene may play out again in Mission: Impossible – Fallout, the stakes here are considerably lower than three nuclear bombs going off. Instead, what everyone’s after here is a list of undercover spies. Following the reliably thrilling opening montage, set to Lalo Schifrin’s iconic theme, we continue the motif of characters watching movies as we meet Jim Phelps on a flight to Prague. The task set forth for his crew involves infiltrating a nameless embassy. From there, they must find a diplomatic attaché who wishes to sell the list to the highest bidder and follow and arrest both him and his buyer. As Phelps, played by Jon Voight says, it’s a “very simple objective.” But as we soon learn, things are rarely simple or what they seem in the realm of espionage.

To say things go wrong is an understatement. The initial crew, which includes Kristin Scott Thomas’ Sarah Davies or Emilio Estevez’s Benji prototype, all go down in gruesome ways. Their mark and Sarah are both stabbed and left for dead, while Estevez’s computer geek Jack Harmon is gored by an elevator prong. Another operative is killed by a car bomb, while Phelps is shot and falls into the Vltava river. Eventually, Hunt is the apparent sole survivor of the mission, going off to phone a friend. He gets directed to a meeting at a seafood restaurant, enclosed in glass, where he meets IMF Director Eugene Kittridge for an apparent briefing and extraction to the United States. However, fish aren’t the only things getting grilled at this establishment, and the apparent transparency of the building is a ruse. 

The mission his team was sent on was a “mole hunt,” we discover, with the real list safely sealed away at the CIA. Turns out Hunt and his former crew aren’t the only ones who wear masks, since Kittridge, a spy hunter and excellent foil to Hunt played by Henry Czerny, suspects Hunt is the mole. So begins another familiar signpost for this franchise: the moment when Hunt is cut off from support and suspected of being a traitor. So, in the spirit of clearing the air with Kittridge, Cruise blows a hole in a nearby aquarium and flees the scene, suspecting something fishy going on. 

After escaping from his would-be captors, what does our hero, who will in later installments undertake a HALO jump and scale a cliff or two do next? Why, head to a computer, of course, to send some emails and then fall asleep. While later films in the series live up to the usual expectations of summer movies, working hard to bust your blocks off, this first film operates in a quieter gear. Witness, for example, how much time the movie spends with Cruise’s first team, and his interactions with them. Sure, our star may have received a heroic push in from the camera at the beginning as he tore that mask off. But in the Prague briefing room, he’s just one of the guys, making jokes at his boss’s expense, part of a cohesive unit. No wonder he appears heartbroken when he first meets Kittridge. This wasn’t just a group of coworkers but friends.

While Cruise deserves credit for putting a human face on things, his offscreen team certainly worked wonders as well with the source material, a television show which first ran from 1966 to 1973 before getting revived in 1988 to 1990. With delightfully knotty plotting by Steve Zaillian and David Koepp, who wrote the screenplay with Robert Towne, this is a movie worth paying attention to so you know what the stakes are and who’s doing what and why. The sequels may strip the story down to make more room for action, but there’s still something pleasurable in watching this movie pace itself with the thrills. By taking its time with both the early embassy mission and the later CIA vault heist, the movie shows us two things. One, we get to see how an IMF team works and all the little gadgets they get to use, and two, we see how even the slightest unplanned error or variable can quickly tip a successful mission into a catastrophe. And who better to conduct these nerve-shredding sequences than the Master of Suspense from the film brat generation? Enter Brian De Palma, who wisely chose to accept the mission of bringing this movie to the silver screen. 

With De Palma directing, we get plenty of Dutch tilts, of course, but the real treat is watching as he blends the eventual tension with a whiff of humor. Forget the questioning cruelty of Jason Bourne or the older escapism of James Bond. As De Palma understands it, we’re here for thrills and chills, to be sure, but we’ll take some laughs too. And he delivers on all fronts. Take, for instance, the moment when Hunt is inches above the pressure-sensitive floor in the CIA vault, after Jean Reno’s Franz Krieger loses control of the rope holding him aloft. We’ve seen how sensitive the floor is earlier, after a single bead of condensation from a glass hit the ground. And yet, while remaining tense, there is something delightfully silly as Cruise flaps his limbs about, as if he could achieve lift velocity to avoid hitting the ground. Much like Cary Grant getting chased down by a barnstorming plane in North by Northwest, De Palma finds the line between sublimity and silliness, managing to ride it for the entire movie. How else to explain the concept of lifelike masks characters tear away with almost gleeful abandon, or the decision to stop the movie’s momentum for a quick sleight-of-hand performance? And when you have spies breaking into the most heavily secured room in the CIA using nothing more than a quick costume change, plus smoke and mirrors, you can’t help but admire the audacity of it all. Forget the heady conversations around who the real mole is, the movie implies. Instead, how about a show?  

Posted in Features | Tagged 1996, Belated Comebacker, Brian DePalma, Emilio Estevez, Jean Reno, Jon Voight, Kristin Scott Thomas, Tom Cruise, Vanessa Redgrave, Ving Rhames, year of the month

About the Author

Sam “Burgundy Suit” Scott

Sam is a features writer for Looper and studied writing under Kevin Wilson at Sewanee: the University of the South. He’s been a staff writer for The Solute since its launch in 2014 and editor of the Year of the Month series since 2017.

I don’t know how to put this, but he’s kind of a big deal. He has many leather-bound books and his apartment smells of rich mahogany.

Now on Patreon!
https://www.patreon.com/user/creators?u=23744950

  • Tumblr
  • Twitter

Related Posts

Year of the Month: Haley Ioppini on PROCOL HARUM→

Year of the Month: Sunil Patel on THE DIRTY DOZEN→

Year of the Month: Nikita Komarov on THE YOUNG GIRLS OF ROCHEFORT→

Year of the Month: 55 Years of 100 YEARS OF SOLITUDE→

  • Comments
  • Popular
  • Most Recent
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleWonderful piece, Sam. It's made…
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleFellow heretic here. I've never…
  • n***********@gmail.com'
    Ruck Cohlchez on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEI wouldn't have called it…
  • j***********@gmail.com'
    Son of Griff on LIFE ITSELFGlad to hear back from…
  • n*********@gmail.com'
    Jake Gittes on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEThis is the single most…
  • “The End” of SAVAGES

    31038 views / Posted November 10, 2014
  • What the fuck did I just watch? SPHERE

    26554 views / Posted March 19, 2015
  • Scenic Routes: SHOWGIRLS (1995)

    19053 views / Posted November 20, 2014
  • The Untalented Mr. Ripley: The Craft of Standup Comedy and the Non-Comedy of TOM MYERS

    18348 views / Posted June 26, 2018
  • Yvonne, or: CASABLANCA In One Character and Three Scenes

    9700 views / Posted August 21, 2014
  • Year of the Month: Haley Ioppini on PROCOL HARUM

    June 30, 2022 / Sam "Burgundy Suit" Scott
  • "Based on a true story."

    Lunch Links: OUT

    June 30, 2022 / The Ploughman
  • Is this someone you want making choices for you?

    Choose

    June 29, 2022 / Gillianren
  • Year of the Month: Sunil Patel on THE DIRTY DOZEN

    June 29, 2022 / Sam "Burgundy Suit" Scott
  • Film on the Internet: THE RENTAL

    June 29, 2022 / ZoeZ

Last Tweets

  • Year of the Month: Haley Ioppini on PROCOL HARUM - https://t.co/KVDKLupAS5, 8 hours ago
  • Finish out Pride Month with this week's Lunch Link OUT. https://t.co/tkEDYM1tzF, 11 hours ago
  • Choose - https://t.co/sqVw2yHzWR, Jun 29

©2014 - 2016 The-Solute | Hosted, Developed and Maintained by Bellingham WP LogoBellinghamWP.com.

Menu

  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!