Browse: Home / Taco Break: The Preponderance of the “Director’s Cut”

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login

The-SoluteLogo

A Film Site By Lovers of Film

Menu

Skip to content
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Long Reviews
  • News
  • Articles and Opinions
  • Other Media
  • The Friday Article Roundup: The Truth is In Here
  • Lunch Links: Schwarzfahrer
  • Websites on the Internet: THE SOLUTE
  • New on DVD and Blu-Ray
  • Movie Gifts Holidays 2024

Taco Break: The Preponderance of the “Director’s Cut”

Posted By Julius Kassendorf on January 19, 2017 in Short Articles | 91 Responses

This week, Michael Mann’s Ali is coming out with a third “director’s cut” of the movie, trying to align the 15 year old film with his current political vision of Mohammad Ali’s story. In an interview with Deadline, Mann gave this reason for his new version:

With the hindsight of history, I felt the drama didn’t get all the way there. It wasn’t as strong as it should have been.

Of course, this is with 15 additional years of hindsight, and the Michael Mann of 2016 is different than the Michael Mann of 2001. Heck, no matter how old we are, the us of 2016 is vastly different than the us of 2001.

Back in the early early days of Hollywood, movies would run into a variety of censor boards across the country and end up with multiple prints that each have some scene or other excised based on where the print was being shown. When it came time to remaster these films for preservation purposes, many film restoration experts had to track down lost prints and reassemble the films into their original states. The prime example of this would be Metropolis, where new footage was found in the past decade on a 16mm reel in Argentina.

In essence, the director’s cut is really about the rise of the auteur over the domination of the studio. Orson Welles was a director whose artistic visions were constantly sullied by studio meddling, and had his movies altered prior to their release. The Magnificent Ambersons is the most notorious example of this, with a preview rough cut that ran 135 minutes, and a final cut that ran 88 minutes with a completely changed ending. The studio even changed the score enough for Bernard Herrmann to remove his name from the film. That original footage is still lost. Welles would face the same struggle with Touch of Evil, which would also have modern attempts at restoration.

From the 1950s through the early 1970s, studios had roadshow presentations: theatrical presentations of movies in selected cities that featured longer versions of the movies. For instance, South Pacific had a roadshow version of about 3 hours, but in its general release was chopped to 2-and-a-half hours. Roadshow movies had limited runs with higher ticket prices and lower screenings per day than the general release movies did.

When the MPAA came into the picture, many movies had to cut their graphic footage to garner an R-Rating over an X or, later, an NC-17. Because of the rise of pornography that would wear its X-rating on its sleeve, the X-rating would be banned from advertising in papers and television in many markets, diminishing knowledge or access to the film. Because of the diminished returns, the MPAA was able to force studios and directors to release R-Rated edits based on MPAA suggestions.

And then came Spielberg. Close Encounters of the Third Kind was the first film to really have the vanity director’s cut. He had been running out of time and budget when the original movie was released in 1977. Because this was before the rise of home video, studios were used to re-releasing their successful films periodically to make even more money. After Close Encounters was successful, Spielberg asked the studio for money to add in more scenes, which would be incorporated into the re-release of the movie in 1980.

On home video, the directors cut and special editions flourished, especially post-1990. The 1990 “Director’s Cut” of Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner might not have been the first director’s cut or special edition to flout its differences from the original release, but it became a highly prominent one due to a well-trodden argument over studio interference with the theatrical cut.

Throughout the 1990s, directors cuts and special editions would become regular staples on VHS due to its lowered stakes. On home video, studios didn’t have to worry about the number of times a movie could be shown in a theater. Studios also didn’t have to worry about lost revenue due to diminished newspaper advertising caused by the NC-17 rating. From James Cameron’s The Abyss to Oliver Stone’s Natural Born Killers to Jason Goes to Hell, the Director’s Cut rose to prominence in the comfort of our own home.

Then George Lucas re-edited the original trilogy of Star Wars starting the wave of vanity edits of major releases. Vanity edits would see theatrical re-releases of movies as changed by their original directors to suit their present attitudes about film: Spielberg re-edited E.T. in 2002, Ridley Scott re-edited Alien in 2003, and had a final cut of Blade Runner in 2007. And these re-edits don’t count the fiddling happening on home video.

I shouldn’t and couldn’t forget the numerous cash grabs that are “Unrated” home video releases. I don’t mean the movies where the MPAA actually made the directors make cuts. I’m talking about raunchy comedies and horror movies that change one or two things from the theatrical R-rated edition and re-release it as having “NEW UNCENSORED FOOTAGE.”

Are there limitations to the changes directors should make to their original releases? Should we approach these as pure money grabs? Though sometimes the new edit has valid reasons for its existence, often these new releases deserve all the skepticism and derision we can give them.

I can almost hear George Lucas screaming “NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!” from here.

Posted in Short Articles | Tagged Directors Cut, George Lucas, NOOOOOOOOO, Oliver Stone, Orson Welles, Ridley Scott, Special Edition, Steven Spielberg, Taco Break

About the Author

Julius Kassendorf

Julius Kassendorf is the founder of The-Solute, and previously founded The Other FIlms and Project Runaways in 2013. There, he dabbled in form within reviews to better textualize thought processes about the medium of film.

Previously, he has blogged at other, now-defunct, websites that you probably haven’t heard of, and had a boyfriend in Canada for many years. Julius resides in Seattle, where he enjoys the full life of the Seattle Film Community.

Julius’ commanding rule about film: Don’t Be Common. He believes the worst thing in the world is for a film to be like every other film, with a secondary crime of being a film with little to no ambition.

Related Posts

Taco Break: Revealed!→

Taco Break: Casting Characters in Other Roles→

Like young Jodie Foster escaping from Dr. StrangeloveTaco Break: Posterized (by Miller)→

Taco Break: Wanted it to Work→

  • Comments
  • Popular
  • Most Recent
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleWonderful piece, Sam. It's made…
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleFellow heretic here. I've never…
  • n***********@gmail.com'
    Ruck Cohlchez on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEI wouldn't have called it…
  • j***********@gmail.com'
    Son of Griff on LIFE ITSELFGlad to hear back from…
  • n*********@gmail.com'
    Jake Gittes on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEThis is the single most…
  • “The End” of SAVAGES

    38350 views / Posted November 10, 2014
  • The Untalented Mr. Ripley: The Craft of Standup Comedy and the Non-Comedy of TOM MYERS

    30685 views / Posted June 26, 2018
  • What the fuck did I just watch? SPHERE

    30328 views / Posted March 19, 2015
  • Gordon with Mr. Looper

    Attention Must Be Paid: Will Lee

    27640 views / Posted January 7, 2023
  • Scenic Routes: SHOWGIRLS (1995)

    23315 views / Posted November 20, 2014
  • The truth is FAR out there.

    The Friday Article Roundup: The Truth is In Here

    December 6, 2024 / The Ploughman
  • This is a way lower res image than I will be allowed to get away with at the new site.

    Lunch Links: Schwarzfahrer

    December 5, 2024 / The Ploughman
  • Websites on the Internet: THE SOLUTE

    December 4, 2024 / ZoeZ
  • New on DVD and Blu-Ray

    December 3, 2024 / Greta Taylor
  • Movie Gifts Holidays 2024

    December 2, 2024 / The Ploughman

Last Tweets

    ©2014 - 2016 The-Solute | Hosted, Developed and Maintained by Bellingham WP LogoBellinghamWP.com.

    Menu

    • Home
    • Who We Are
    • About
    • Privacy
    • Contact Us
    • Login
    Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!