Browse: Home / The Meryl Streep Thing

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login

The-SoluteLogo

A Film Site By Lovers of Film

Menu

Skip to content
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Long Reviews
  • News
  • Articles and Opinions
  • Other Media
  • The High and Low of Flaherty's 20s: NANOOK and MOANA
  • New Hollywood Got Old
  • Decade of the Month: Sunil Patel on SHERLOCK, JR.
  • Film on the Internet: GHOST DOG: THE WAY OF THE SAMURAI
  • Camera Obscura: EXIT TO EDEN

The Meryl Streep Thing

Posted By Gillianren on January 3, 2018 in Short Articles | 22 Responses

It’s been a while since I’ve written one of my lengthy explanations of why I don’t like someone’s work. Arguably, I write every week, twice, about why I do—when I’m celebrating the living or paying attention. I suppose I feel that, when you say nice things about people as often as I do, you’re entitled to crab a bit about people you don’t like. There is also my ongoing feeling that, when I write it out, I’m explaining once and never have to do so again. You can just point to the article and be done.

I’m not sure when I first saw a Meryl Streep movie. I’m thinking the first one I saw was probably Silkwood, which is one of the few I’ll defend despite my dislike of her—though even there, I’m likely to grumble about how the other performances tend to get ignored. I’m pretty sure I saw it in high school—I can’t imagine having seen most of her movies before then, since the first one she made that would likely have been of interest to me younger wasn’t even made until then. Death Becomes Her came out in 1992, when I was a freshman in high school. So for some time, I don’t remember having much of an opinion one way or the other.

I did hear an awful lot about her movies, though. As I’ve mentioned before, Mom watched At the Movies every week, so my formative years included hearing her praised for Out of Africa and Ironweed. Neither of which I saw until relatively recently, so I did not then have an opinion. But it was clear that everyone, everyone, thought she was a Great Actress. In fact, she was the go-to example of a Great Actress if you weren’t looking at people who’d acted in black and white.

And then I actually started watching movies with her in them, and I . . . wasn’t impressed? Oh, yes, Sophie’s Choice. But I don’t know if it’s that she’s barely in The Deer Hunter or that I just don’t remember her; that’s definitely a movie about men, and she, as the token woman, barely registers. But almost the only two movies of hers where I’ve thought she was really good in a challenging role were in 1982 and 1983. It’s not that she’s been bad in most of the movies of hers that I’ve seen, though there is Into the Woods, and Out of Africa is so dull that it’s hard to say if she’s objectively worse than the surrounding film. It’s that she has not, in my opinion, been particularly good. Certainly not deserving of the praise she’s showered with.

Oh, I know. Not a popular opinion. Though even her most devout fans will grant me The Iron Lady, I’ve discovered. But I’m not sure I’ve ever seen her in a role that I didn’t think another actress could play and probably better. Even Silkwood gets slightly confused in my head with Norma Rae. Sally Field, given a chance, could have been very good as Karen Silkwood. Though I grant you I’m not sure who I’d cast as Sophie.

Not that “no one else could play that role as well” is necessary for me to consider someone a good actress; for one thing, that’s an awfully subjective concept. (Though, fans of hers, give me Into the Woods as well—for one thing, Bernadette Peters is only a year older than Streep.) But it strikes me that, when Streep plays a role, everyone falls all over themselves to say no one else could do it, even when that is, as in Into the Woods, just demonstrably untrue. So if you don’t believe she’s anything spectacular, it just gets hard to take and builds into some pretty serious dislike over the years. I’ve started joking that my dislike of her is merely bringing needed balance to the universe.

I mean, I first saw Oscar buzz for her for Julie and Julia while that movie was still filming. And it’s worth noting that the buzz specifically suggested Best Actress. Now, I’ve read Julie and Julia, apparently one of the people who has, and there’s no reason to believe from reading the book that Julia Child would be the lead role in the movie, since she barely appears in the book. That’s the kind of thing I’m talking about, here.

I don’t hassle her about the accent thing, though. She’s managed to avoid that trap for some time now; jokes about Meryl Streep’s accents is kind of the film equivalent of jokes about airline food.

 

Keep the fires burning for Hot Takes like these; consider supporting my Patreon!

Posted in Short Articles | Tagged Analysis, Meryl Streep, meta

About the Author

gillianmadeira@hotmail.com'

Gillianren

Gillianren is a forty-something bipolar woman living in the Pacific Northwest after growing up in Los Angeles County. She and her boyfriend have one son and one daughter, and she gave a daughter up for adoption. She fills her days by watching her local library system’s DVD collection in alphabetical order, watching everything that looks interesting. She particularly enjoys pre-Code films, blaxploitation, and live-action Disney movies of the ’60s and ’70s. She has a Patreon account at https://www.patreon.com/gillianren

Related Posts

Distrusting the Stubble: Society’s Judgement of Facial Hair→

A Soderbergh Escapade: LET THEM ALL TALK→

No Sense of Proportion→

Sports Movies: A National Obsession→

  • Comments
  • Popular
  • Most Recent
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleWonderful piece, Sam. It's made…
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleFellow heretic here. I've never…
  • n***********@gmail.com'
    Ruck Cohlchez on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEI wouldn't have called it…
  • j***********@gmail.com'
    Son of Griff on LIFE ITSELFGlad to hear back from…
  • n*********@gmail.com'
    Jake Gittes on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEThis is the single most…
  • “The End” of SAVAGES

    30631 views / Posted November 10, 2014
  • What the fuck did I just watch? SPHERE

    26379 views / Posted March 19, 2015
  • Scenic Routes: SHOWGIRLS (1995)

    18877 views / Posted November 20, 2014
  • The Untalented Mr. Ripley: The Craft of Standup Comedy and the Non-Comedy of TOM MYERS

    17627 views / Posted June 26, 2018
  • Yvonne, or: CASABLANCA In One Character and Three Scenes

    9527 views / Posted August 21, 2014
  • Flaherty of the Slightly Lower North.

    The High and Low of Flaherty’s 20s: NANOOK and MOANA

    May 19, 2022 / The Ploughman
  • It's all art

    New Hollywood Got Old

    May 18, 2022 / Gillianren
  • Decade of the Month: Sunil Patel on SHERLOCK, JR.

    May 18, 2022 / Sam "Burgundy Suit" Scott
  • Film on the Internet: GHOST DOG: THE WAY OF THE SAMURAI

    May 18, 2022 / ZoeZ
  • Book and movie

    Camera Obscura: EXIT TO EDEN

    May 17, 2022 / Gillianren

Last Tweets

  • Robert Flaherty, pioneering documentary filmmaker of the 20s! NANOOK OF THE NORTH and MOANA aka NO, NOT THAT MOANA. https://t.co/u98PzwtOOQ, 19 hours ago
  • New Hollywood Got Old - https://t.co/99OgoncKek, May 18
  • Decace of the Month: Sunil Patel on SHERLOCK, JR. - https://t.co/cv96VgaANA, May 18

©2014 - 2016 The-Solute | Hosted, Developed and Maintained by Bellingham WP LogoBellinghamWP.com.

Menu

  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!