Browse: Home / Camera Obscura: PHANTOM LADY

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login

The-SoluteLogo

A Film Site By Lovers of Film

Menu

Skip to content
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Long Reviews
  • News
  • Articles and Opinions
  • Other Media
  • Year of the Month: Sunil Patel on HEAT
  • Devil Man Running In My Head: Miller on ASTRO-CREEP 2000
  • GORDY: 1995's Other White Meat
  • Film on the Internet: THE PROWLER (1951)
  • NEWSRADIO's cunning plans and crazy capers
First edition, movie poster

Camera Obscura: PHANTOM LADY

Posted By Gillianren on August 15, 2023 in Features | Leave a response

We come to this one by way of Lux Radio Theatre. For the unfamiliar, Lux Radio Theatre was a long-running radio program that initially adapted Broadway shows and then came to adapt movies. Often, the original stars were involved, though sometimes, stars of a similar caliber took their place—and sometimes, completely random people who were unfamiliar even to audiences of the time. On March 27, 1944, Lux Radio Theatre did an adaptation of Phantom Lady, with two of the original stars reprising their roles and Brian Aherne in the Franchot Tone role, which is quite a switch.

A man of about thirty is having a bad evening. He goes into a bar, where he meets a woman. He invites her to go out with him, to have the dinner and see the show he’d been planning to see with someone else. They agree not to name names, not to tell each other anything about themselves. And so they have the dinner and see the show and then part ways. And then when he gets home, he finds his wife murdered. As Scott Henderson, as we now know him to be, discovers this, he also learns that he is the prime suspect—not just because he’s the husband and therefore the obvious prime suspect but because she was murdered with his own tie, strangled so viciously it will have to be cut from her neck.

Oh, also, he’s been having an affair and she wouldn’t give him a divorce, and now he can’t remember any details about the woman he went out with that night. And somehow no one else can remember her, either, despite her making herself conspicuous when they went to the show by wearing the exact same hat as its star did and literally stealing some of the spotlight from her. So he’s convicted, and sentenced to death, and he actually manages to summon an old friend back from a five-year stint in South America to investigate the whole thing for him.

Obviously, the movie loses the affair. We still have Scott (Alan Curtis) and the mystery woman (Fay Helm), but we have acquired a Plucky Young Secretary (Ella Raines) as Carol Richman instead of a woman with whom he’s in love and for whom he was hoping to divorce his wife. Because, you know, Code. But Jack Marlowe (Tone) is still there and still summoned from South America and still goes about in the full knowledge that his best friend will die if the mystery woman is not proven to exist and proven to have been with Scott at the time the murder took place.

The detective tells Scott in the book that one of the reasons he comes to believe that he’s telling the truth is that any liar would bother making up some sort of description for the mystery woman, and Scott does not. Honestly he kind of comes across as having mild face-blindness, which is a thing, because he literally cannot remember any detail of the mystery woman. He doesn’t ever make anything up about her, just describe the hat and keep insisting that he gets like that, where he can’t remember faces.

Which leads to the second thought I have—there is simply not enough evidence to convict Scott of murder. I have reasonable doubt even not knowing that he didn’t do it. To believe the prosecution, you’d have to believe that he murdered his wife, then went off and had a full dinner and went to a fun show. What’s more, it’s not entirely believable that literally no one who was at the show would remember the incident with the hat as described in the book. Sure, you’d have a better chance if you could prove that the woman was with him at 6:10 (the movie moves everything back two hours for some reason), but proving she exists would go a long way to proving Scott’s story.

Things move very fast in the book. Each chapter, and I quite like this conceit, starts with how long there is until the execution. Even the first one, before the murder has happened—or at least before we know it’s happened, for most of the chapter—starts that way. Cornell Woolrich, who wrote it under the name William Irish, did a fine job of writing even if some of the book’s plot does not entirely make sense. It’s got some beautiful description in it, and it manages to be hardboiled without being cliché about it. The movie’s fine, and the Lux Radio Theatre captured out interest almost despite ourselves, but if you’re going to pick one, go for the book.

Next month, we’re going back to Disney for The Horse in the Grey Flannel Suit. The movie stars Dean Jones and a very young Kurt Russell; I’ve never read the book before. Is it any good? We’ll all find out together! And to help me acquire a copy, you can support my Patreon or Ko-fi!

Posted in Features | Tagged camera obscura, Phantom Lady

About the Author

gillianmadeira@hotmail.com'

Gillianren

Gillianren is a forty-something bipolar woman living in the Pacific Northwest after growing up in Los Angeles County. She and her boyfriend have one son and one daughter, and she gave a daughter up for adoption. She fills her days by watching her local library system’s DVD collection in alphabetical order, watching everything that looks interesting. She particularly enjoys pre-Code films, blaxploitation, and live-action Disney movies of the ’60s and ’70s. She has a Patreon account at https://www.patreon.com/gillianren

Related Posts

No gallant knights in the bookCamera Obscura: THE STARS IN THEIR COURSES/EL DORADO→

Look at that innocent face!Camera Obscura: THE BAD SEED→

The Year of the Horse in the Gray Flannel SuitCamera Obscura: THE YEAR OF THE HORSE/THE HORSE IN THE GRAY FLANNEL SUIT→

book cover/movie posterCamera Obscura: DEAR LOLA/THE BENIKER GANG→

  • Comments
  • Popular
  • Most Recent
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleWonderful piece, Sam. It's made…
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleFellow heretic here. I've never…
  • n***********@gmail.com'
    Ruck Cohlchez on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEI wouldn't have called it…
  • j***********@gmail.com'
    Son of Griff on LIFE ITSELFGlad to hear back from…
  • n*********@gmail.com'
    Jake Gittes on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEThis is the single most…
  • “The End” of SAVAGES

    35798 views / Posted November 10, 2014
  • What the fuck did I just watch? SPHERE

    28330 views / Posted March 19, 2015
  • The Untalented Mr. Ripley: The Craft of Standup Comedy and the Non-Comedy of TOM MYERS

    27297 views / Posted June 26, 2018
  • Gordon with Mr. Looper

    Attention Must Be Paid: Will Lee

    26736 views / Posted January 7, 2023
  • Scenic Routes: SHOWGIRLS (1995)

    20874 views / Posted November 20, 2014
  • Year of the Month: Sunil Patel on HEAT

    November 30, 2023 / Sam "Burgundy Suit" Scott
  • Devil Man Running In My Head: Miller on ASTRO-CREEP 2000

    November 30, 2023 / Sam "Burgundy Suit" Scott
  • Capitalist pig

    GORDY: 1995’s Other White Meat

    November 30, 2023 / The Ploughman
  • Film on the Internet: THE PROWLER (1951)

    November 29, 2023 / ZoeZ
  • NEWSRADIO’s cunning plans and crazy capers

    November 28, 2023 / Ruck Cohlchez

Last Tweets

    ©2014 - 2016 The-Solute | Hosted, Developed and Maintained by Bellingham WP LogoBellinghamWP.com.

    Menu

    • Home
    • Who We Are
    • About
    • Privacy
    • Contact Us
    • Login
    Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!