Browse: Home / PSYCHO’s Enduring Power by Désirée I. Guzzetta

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login

The-SoluteLogo

A Film Site By Lovers of Film

Menu

Skip to content
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Long Reviews
  • News
  • Articles and Opinions
  • Other Media
  • The Friday Article Roundup: For Your Consideration
  • A Quick and Cheap Summary of Roger Corman's 1963
  • Due
  • Film on the Internet: THE VERDICT
  • New on DVD and Blu-Ray

PSYCHO’s Enduring Power by Désirée I. Guzzetta

Posted By Sam "Burgundy Suit" Scott on October 31, 2021 in Features | Leave a response

Alfred Hitchcock was already a respected and successful director by the time he made Psycho in 1960. The master of suspense and psychological thrillers had made some hit films, but Psycho was a smash. Made for $806,947, it grossed over $32 million. 

Hitchcock meticulously and purposely shot Psycho in black and white not only to keep the budget down, but also to de-emphasize the gore of the famous shower scene. Instead, he relied on the other technique he was a master of: manipulation. As Hitchcock told fellow director François Truffaut, “It was rather exciting to use the camera to deceive the audience.”1 Every shot and every angle went toward that deception.

To backtrack a bit: Nowadays, it’s more common for a well-known actor to be killed in the beginning of the film; see Drew Barrymore in the opening of 1996’s Scream. But in 1960, audiences going to see a Janet Leigh film expected to see Janet Leigh throughout the entire film. And when the film starts as more of a crime thriller, where Leigh’s Marion Crane steals $40,000 to start a new life with her lover, you couldn’t blame the audience for expecting to see her either get caught or get away.

Except she doesn’t do either because she has the misfortune to stop for a night at the Bates Motel.

Approximately 47 minutes into the film’s 109-minute run time, Marion is murdered. The actual attack lasts less than a minute, but the shock and terror – especially for an audience unprepared for their crime film to suddenly become a horror movie – lasts long past the final credits.

So what gives Psycho its enduring power to scare, even as what powered its main shocks in 1960 is more run-of-the-mill today? I would argue it all comes down to the shower scene, a scene that for all its blood and Bernard Herrmann’s piercing, screeching violins, eschews explicit gore for psychological resonance. Never once does the blade pierce Marion’s body, or even get that close to her, but through a series of quick cuts, Hitchcock makes you think you saw a graphic death. I know people who to this day swear they saw Marion get stabbed in the stomach. But it simply doesn’t happen.

The other reason is how ordinary the scene is. A woman gets into a shower, starts soaping up, and seems at peace (Marion had just decided to go back home and confess she stole the money). The music stops, giving way to the natural sounds of the shower. Everything is normal. Then a shadow appears behind the shower curtain, getting closer until the intruder pulls back the curtain and raises the knife. The terror on Marion’s face, coupled with the horrible sounds of a blade slicing into flesh, and ending with the dying Marion slowly reaching out and pulling the shower curtain off the rod before slumping over the tub onto the bathroom tile, is unnerving. I’ve got goosebumps just typing this out. As Hitchcock dissolves between the blood going down the shower drain and Marion’s open eye, the drops of water look like tears. After the attack ends, the score again gives way to the diegetic sound of the shower. It’s absolutely unsettling that something so private is so grossly violated.

I asked my mom, who had seen Psycho when it came out, if audiences really were that surprised, and she told me it was completely shocking and made her afraid to shower for a long time after (like mother, like daughter in that respect!). My high school film teacher told us the same thing, saying the shower scene scarred her for life. It wasn’t just the main character’s sudden death, though. It was a primal fear borne of being caught completely naked and vulnerable. 

Hitchcock, ever the master manipulator, kept the killer’s identity a secret through several high angle shots where you only see the top of his be-wigged head. Unlike the audience, Marion would have seen Norman Bates’ face as he killed her, but for viewers, the killer was unknown and would remain that way until the reveal in the cellar. Of course viewers would think it was the mysterious woman in the old Bates house, but when Sam finally grabs Norman and the wig falls off, the ruse is over. My mom said the reveal also shocked the audience.

While the death of Arbogast (Martin Balsam) later in the movie uses the same technique of sound to heighten fear, as Hitchcock only shows the knife coming in and out of the frame and not into the unlucky detective’s body, it’s the shower scene that persists in the popular imagination, and with good reason. Hitchcock’s use of the camera to deceive the audience into thinking it’s seen more than he’s shown has given that, and by extension, the entire film, an enduring power to terrify.

Unlike my mother, though, I still haven’t quite gotten over my fear of showers.

 

1 “Hitchcock” (Revised Edition) by François Truffaut, 1983, Simon & Schuster, Inc., p 277

 

Posted in Features | Tagged 1951, Alfred Hitchcock, Anthony Perkins, Désirée Guzzetta, Horror, Janet Leigh, Martin Balsam, Psycho, year of the month

About the Author

Sam “Burgundy Suit” Scott

Sam is a features writer for Looper and studied writing under Kevin Wilson at Sewanee: the University of the South. He’s been a staff writer for The Solute since its launch in 2014 and editor of the Year of the Month series since 2017.

I don’t know how to put this, but he’s kind of a big deal. He has many leather-bound books and his apartment smells of rich mahogany.

Now on Patreon!
https://www.patreon.com/user/creators?u=23744950

  • Tumblr
  • Twitter

Related Posts

The buffet table should be this long at lunch, no longer.A Quick and Cheap Summary of Roger Corman’s 1963→

Year of the Month: HOP ON POP→

Out of context Disney images strikes again!Disney Byways: SAVAGE SAM→

Film on the Internet: SMILE→

  • Comments
  • Popular
  • Most Recent
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleWonderful piece, Sam. It's made…
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleFellow heretic here. I've never…
  • n***********@gmail.com'
    Ruck Cohlchez on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEI wouldn't have called it…
  • j***********@gmail.com'
    Son of Griff on LIFE ITSELFGlad to hear back from…
  • n*********@gmail.com'
    Jake Gittes on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEThis is the single most…
  • “The End” of SAVAGES

    33163 views / Posted November 10, 2014
  • What the fuck did I just watch? SPHERE

    27247 views / Posted March 19, 2015
  • The Untalented Mr. Ripley: The Craft of Standup Comedy and the Non-Comedy of TOM MYERS

    24483 views / Posted June 26, 2018
  • Scenic Routes: SHOWGIRLS (1995)

    19919 views / Posted November 20, 2014
  • Yvonne, or: CASABLANCA In One Character and Three Scenes

    10884 views / Posted August 21, 2014
  • The Friday Article Roundup: For Your Consideration

    January 27, 2023 / The Ploughman
  • The buffet table should be this long at lunch, no longer.

    A Quick and Cheap Summary of Roger Corman’s 1963

    January 26, 2023 / The Ploughman
  • Is she due?

    Due

    January 25, 2023 / Gillianren
  • Film on the Internet: THE VERDICT

    January 25, 2023 / ZoeZ
  • New on DVD and Blu-Ray

    January 24, 2023 / Greta Taylor

Last Tweets

  • The Friday Article Roundup: For Your Consideration - https://t.co/5z8kfFCCoX, 11 hours ago
  • Roger Corman's 1963 was emblematic of the prolific, imaginative director: https://t.co/RF6FHrbK1R, Jan 26
  • Due - https://t.co/8SeMveLK23, Jan 25

©2014 - 2016 The-Solute | Hosted, Developed and Maintained by Bellingham WP LogoBellinghamWP.com.

Menu

  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!