Browse: Home / SEDUCTION OF THE INNOCENT: Missing Just a Few Details

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login

The-SoluteLogo

A Film Site By Lovers of Film

Menu

Skip to content
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Long Reviews
  • News
  • Articles and Opinions
  • Other Media
  • The Friday Article Roundup: The Truth is In Here
  • Lunch Links: Schwarzfahrer
  • Websites on the Internet: THE SOLUTE
  • New on DVD and Blu-Ray
  • Movie Gifts Holidays 2024

SEDUCTION OF THE INNOCENT: Missing Just a Few Details

Posted By Gillianren on July 15, 2016 in Features | 4 Responses

If you’re curious, Seventeen magazine was first published in 1944—the year my mom was born and eight years before Seduction of the Innocent was published. Now, I’ve never seen a copy from that era, so I guess I theoretically could be wrong. But if there weren’t one or two articles—not merely ads but full articles—published in those eight years about how to lose weight, gain weight, or rearrange weight, I, for one, will be shocked. Because I know my teen magazines. Clearly—and say it with me, now—Wertham does not, as quickly becomes evident in chapter eight, “‘Bumps and Bulges’: Advertising in Comic Books.”

It’s frustrating, because this is another place where he’s not entirely wrong. I had a friend many years ago whose daughter was, at four, already being convinced by her paternal grandparents that she was fat. (She wasn’t.) There’s a lot of emphasis on appearance in our culture, and kids suffer for it. There’s a cosmic injustice to the fact that you first start seriously worrying about your appearance at a time when nature has ensured that it won’t be the best.

But you can’t blame comic books for that. I mean, the 1950s were the era of the bullet bra. Heck, you could open up perfectly ordinary magazines at the time and encounter the world’s most famous bra campaign. For twenty years, shirtless women were dreaming they did random things in their Maidenform bras. You name it, some woman was doing it in her bra.

My grandmother actually used to say that the problem was that she had the figure she did too late for Lillian Russell and too early for Jane Russell. It was hard to be a flapper with a large chest, though I’m sure my grandmother gave it her all. So one imagines that, if Wertham had been writing about the same sort of ads except twenty-five years earlier, he’d have been complaining about all the devices for flattening “problem bosoms” instead of the ones for increasing them.

Why am I spending this long talking about bras? Because Wertham spends some six pages talking about how comic book advertising influences girls’ opinions of their breasts. Oh, okay, there’s also some in there about body fat, about how girls are hit coming and going—ads were out there to encourage girls to put on weight if they were too skinny, too. Though those were more aimed at boys, encouraging them to put on muscle.

It seems, thought, that Wertham is completely unaware of the sheer scope of the industry built on making people feel insecure about their looks. He complains that “Advertising is, or could be—quite apart from its selling aspect—a wholly educational influence,” which is itself indicative that he’s missed the whole point of advertising. He complains about the quack cures being sold for acne and insists that it’s the fact that they’re in comic books that keep them from being investigated for making false claims and so forth, but I swear to you, I saw ads for essentially the same product in the teen magazines of my own adolescence twenty years ago, forty after he was writing.

It may be just me, but there’s something seriously unsettling about how long he lingers on the whole breast thing. He’d been married more than twenty-five years at that point, and I find myself wondering what his wife thought about the whole thing. Was he so unaware of her undergarments, or did she actually not own a girdle? A push-up bra? A merry widow? Any number of the items summed up in the term “foundation garment,” really.

Just in case you thought it was only comic books that tied sexuality and violence, Wertham has plenty of things to say about the weapons ads, too. Mysteriously, none of them are things like “Why is it legal to advertise weapons to children in the first place?” or “Why aren’t mail-order weapons dealers forced to ensure they aren’t selling to minors?” Or, really, much of anything that doesn’t pin the blame for the whole thing on comics.

Yes, he even talks about how many kids shoot their eyes out with BB guns. Which made me look up Red Ryder, actually; before he ever got a comic book, he’d appeared in newspaper comics, a radio show, and several theatrical release movies. And the BB gun is still in production, albeit probably more for nostalgia over A Christmas Story than anything else.

Posted in Features | Tagged Analysis, seduction of the innocent

About the Author

gillianmadeira@hotmail.com'

Gillianren

Gillianren is a forty-something bipolar woman living in the Pacific Northwest after growing up in Los Angeles County. She and her boyfriend have one son and one daughter, and she gave a daughter up for adoption. She fills her days by watching her local library system’s DVD collection in alphabetical order, watching everything that looks interesting. She particularly enjoys pre-Code films, blaxploitation, and live-action Disney movies of the ’60s and ’70s. She has a Patreon account at https://www.patreon.com/gillianren

Related Posts

Willie is so sad he can't be shared with another generation!Disney Byways: Another Year of Disney+→

Look at that face!What Scares Us→

Consider thisMusic and My Freshman Year→

Perfectly normal in a kids' movieDisney Byways: Disney’s Saccharine Reputation→

  • Comments
  • Popular
  • Most Recent
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleWonderful piece, Sam. It's made…
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleFellow heretic here. I've never…
  • n***********@gmail.com'
    Ruck Cohlchez on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEI wouldn't have called it…
  • j***********@gmail.com'
    Son of Griff on LIFE ITSELFGlad to hear back from…
  • n*********@gmail.com'
    Jake Gittes on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEThis is the single most…
  • “The End” of SAVAGES

    38377 views / Posted November 10, 2014
  • The Untalented Mr. Ripley: The Craft of Standup Comedy and the Non-Comedy of TOM MYERS

    30715 views / Posted June 26, 2018
  • What the fuck did I just watch? SPHERE

    30338 views / Posted March 19, 2015
  • Gordon with Mr. Looper

    Attention Must Be Paid: Will Lee

    27649 views / Posted January 7, 2023
  • Scenic Routes: SHOWGIRLS (1995)

    23336 views / Posted November 20, 2014
  • The truth is FAR out there.

    The Friday Article Roundup: The Truth is In Here

    December 6, 2024 / The Ploughman
  • This is a way lower res image than I will be allowed to get away with at the new site.

    Lunch Links: Schwarzfahrer

    December 5, 2024 / The Ploughman
  • Websites on the Internet: THE SOLUTE

    December 4, 2024 / ZoeZ
  • New on DVD and Blu-Ray

    December 3, 2024 / Greta Taylor
  • Movie Gifts Holidays 2024

    December 2, 2024 / The Ploughman

Last Tweets

    ©2014 - 2016 The-Solute | Hosted, Developed and Maintained by Bellingham WP LogoBellinghamWP.com.

    Menu

    • Home
    • Who We Are
    • About
    • Privacy
    • Contact Us
    • Login
    Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!