Browse: Home / Taco Break: Ambiguity and the Potential for Misreading

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login

The-SoluteLogo

A Film Site By Lovers of Film

Menu

Skip to content
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Long Reviews
  • News
  • Articles and Opinions
  • Other Media
  • Celebrating the Living: Conan O'Brien
  • Attention Must Be Paid: Ninón Sevilla
  • Disney Byways: THE INCREDIBLE JOURNEY
  • The Friday Article Roundup: For Your Consideration
  • A Quick and Cheap Summary of Roger Corman's 1963

Taco Break: Ambiguity and the Potential for Misreading

Posted By Julius Kassendorf on February 16, 2017 in Short Articles | 101 Responses

In 1987, Oliver Stone dissected the hyper-materialism of the 1980s with Wall Street, a film where a greedy asshole sets out to make money by destroying an airline and hurting the employees in the process. Gordon Gekko was a prime example of hedonistic wealth who made a mantra out of “Greed is Good.” He’s presented as the embodiment of the corruption of wealth and power, and an extreme result of the continuing separation of management and worker. Oliver Stone, Michael Douglas, and co-writer Stanley Weiser intended Gekko to be a villain; instead, he became a hero. Vanity Fair recounts a DVD interview by hedge fund manager Seth Tobias, “I remember when I saw the movie in 1987. I recall saying, That’s what I want to be. I want to start out as Bud Fox and end up as Gordon Gekko.” He was later found dead in his swimming pool on a mix of cocaine, Ambien and alcohol.

16 years later, Martin Scorsese made The Wolf of Wall Street, a true story about Jordan Belfort, a hedonistic hyper-materialistic Wall Street manager who lives at the heights of life while making money by bankrupting regular people. Based off Belfort’s self-aggrandizing memoir, Scorsese stayed true to Belfort’s tone and expects audiences to realize just how immoral the behavior depicted in the film is. Even as Belfort skips out of years of prison time and neglects to pay his dues, Scorsese waffles on the ending, attempting a half-assed implication of the audience for allowing this behavior to manifest and worshiping at its feet. In my audience, there were a handful of baby Seth Tobiases getting off on Belfort’s behavior, ignoring the message that the movie is supposed to be a grotesquerie.

Increasingly, message movies are afraid of ambiguity. I tent to think that this is partly due to the didactic tendencise of youth, and partly out of fear that their movie’s message might be misunderstood. Nobody wants to make the anti-drug movie that makes drug use seem glamorous. At the extreme other end of the spectrum is Darren Aronofsky’s Requiem For A Dream, which turns drug addiction into a hell spiral. Ambiguity gets thrown out the window for fear that somebody takes your movie the wrong way. Steven Spielberg’s post-9/11 War of the Worlds threw anvil-heavy messaging at the audience in its pro-war-machine propaganda in the shadow of terrorism (especially irresponsible during the misguided Iraq War).

There is reason for this, especially after the litigation explosion of the 1990s. Beavis and Butthead was a show about two juvenile delinquents that made fun of their behavior, yet MTV was sued when somebody claimed that a toddler burned down his trailer park after watching the show. In another incident, Oliver Stone and Time Warner were sued after two people said they watched Natural Born Killers and went on a crime spree; one of many “copycat” crimes, this particular lawsuit became infamous because of John Grisham’s involvement. Though Natural Born Killers was criticized for its sledgehammer moralizing, people still took the wrong message from the movie and/or used it as an excuse for their bad behavior.

But, sometimes the message movies get bogged down in their message and forget to be anything but propaganda. Gus Van Sant’s Promised Land is basically an anti-fracking pamphlet from Mother Jones, with all of the entertainment value that entails. 99 Homes is a Milgrim Experiment-style movie where an innocent person is forced to become a cog in the same machine that crushed him, with plenty of speeches putting the blame on various elements.

All of these examples are narrative based, but the same questions exist in the documentary genre. There’s a whole category of documentaries all based around advocacy for a certain topic. Just as a couple of examples: The Internet’s Own Boy documented the increasing privatization of information while Chasing Ice attacked pollution through the gorgeously tragic footage of ice caps melting. But, on the other end, there are the movies of Frederick Wiseman and Rich Hill, both of which purport to present their situations without bias or interference…leaving people’s public lives open to viewer interpretation.

Can a movie be too didactic or moralistic? Can a movie be too subtle? If people take away the wrong message from the movie, is that a fault of the movie or a fault of the people? Do you have a limitation for the amount of moralizing in your fictional narratives? Should documentaries take a reserved point of view?

Posted in Short Articles | Tagged 99 Homes, Beavis and Butthead, Chasing Ice, Darren Aronofsky, Gus Van Sant, Martin Scorsese, Natural Born Killers, Oliver Stone, Promised Land, Requiem for a Dream, Rich Hill, Steven Spielberg, Taco Break, The Internet's Own Boy, Wall Street, War of the Worlds, Wolf of Wall Street

About the Author

Julius Kassendorf

Julius Kassendorf is the founder of The-Solute, and previously founded The Other FIlms and Project Runaways in 2013. There, he dabbled in form within reviews to better textualize thought processes about the medium of film.

Previously, he has blogged at other, now-defunct, websites that you probably haven’t heard of, and had a boyfriend in Canada for many years. Julius resides in Seattle, where he enjoys the full life of the Seattle Film Community.

Julius’ commanding rule about film: Don’t Be Common. He believes the worst thing in the world is for a film to be like every other film, with a secondary crime of being a film with little to no ambition.

Related Posts

Slate piece next week: Where was the blowhole?Review: THE WHALE→

Taco Break: GENERIC CHRISTMAS MOVIES→

Tales from the Dark Age: The End of an Error→

Tales from the Dark Age: Meanwhile, Back in the States→

  • Comments
  • Popular
  • Most Recent
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleWonderful piece, Sam. It's made…
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleFellow heretic here. I've never…
  • n***********@gmail.com'
    Ruck Cohlchez on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEI wouldn't have called it…
  • j***********@gmail.com'
    Son of Griff on LIFE ITSELFGlad to hear back from…
  • n*********@gmail.com'
    Jake Gittes on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEThis is the single most…
  • “The End” of SAVAGES

    33203 views / Posted November 10, 2014
  • What the fuck did I just watch? SPHERE

    27253 views / Posted March 19, 2015
  • The Untalented Mr. Ripley: The Craft of Standup Comedy and the Non-Comedy of TOM MYERS

    24546 views / Posted June 26, 2018
  • Scenic Routes: SHOWGIRLS (1995)

    19931 views / Posted November 20, 2014
  • Yvonne, or: CASABLANCA In One Character and Three Scenes

    10895 views / Posted August 21, 2014
  • In the year 2000 . . . .

    Celebrating the Living: Conan O’Brien

    January 29, 2023 / Gillianren
  • I mean, shame about the rest of the movie, though.

    Attention Must Be Paid: Ninón Sevilla

    January 28, 2023 / Gillianren
  • Wilderness travelers

    Disney Byways: THE INCREDIBLE JOURNEY

    January 27, 2023 / Gillianren
  • The Friday Article Roundup: For Your Consideration

    January 27, 2023 / The Ploughman
  • The buffet table should be this long at lunch, no longer.

    A Quick and Cheap Summary of Roger Corman’s 1963

    January 26, 2023 / The Ploughman

Last Tweets

  • Celebrating the Living: Conan O’Brien - https://t.co/JUXtIery4k, 9 hours ago
  • Attention Must Be Paid: Ninón Sevilla - https://t.co/NimFiOk7QW, Jan 28
  • Disney Byways: THE INCREDIBLE JOURNEY - https://t.co/CdEiRVrbHc, Jan 28

©2014 - 2016 The-Solute | Hosted, Developed and Maintained by Bellingham WP LogoBellinghamWP.com.

Menu

  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!