Browse: Home / The Historian’s View

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login

The-SoluteLogo

A Film Site By Lovers of Film

Menu

Skip to content
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Long Reviews
  • News
  • Articles and Opinions
  • Other Media
  • Celebrating the Living: Terry Farrell
  • Attention Must Be Paid: Fred Steiner
  • Disney Byways: "How to Dance"
  • The Friday Article Roundup: Blow Off Some Steam
  • Yessir, very atomic!: THE 5,000 FINGERS OF DR. T.

The Historian’s View

Posted By Tristan "Drunk Napoleon" Nankervis on April 10, 2023 in Features, Other Media | Leave a response

Regular readers may know that I have taken to reading more nonfiction history books the past couple of years. I’ve found it comforting and even strangely affirming; any time the news becomes more than I can bear, I turn to a history book and it contextualises it for me. Not necessarily in the sense that I see direct cause-and-effect (Ancient Rome is a bit far back for that), but in that I can see that my emotions are hardly unique or even uncommon. I think people are inclined to see the apocalypse around every corner – every threat, even to one’s own emotions, has the weight and danger of a Bengal tiger – and reading history can humble you about the risks you’re facing. It’s hard to be terribly offended by puritans on Twitter when you know that not only do they have far less actual influence than the Victorian puritans who went after Henry Vizetelly*, even those people couldn’t stop either the work from taking its place in history or Vizetelly from living his best life. Vizetelly suffered the worst grievances, losing his publishing house and much of his reputation… and yet, his children (much more important to him than his business) went on to live happy lives due, in large part, to the skills and contacts they built up working for him.

*As reported in Zola & The Victorians by Eileen Horne.

The upshot of reading the (still embarrassingly small) number of history books I have is that I’ve noticed recurring patterns in the messages they keep trying to convey and moral outlook that drives them. Not to say that all historians agree with each other – certainly not – but rather that many of them end up making the same points from different angles. The most significant to me is their recurring complaint that so many people seem to ask some variation on “what was the right decision?”. They are asked this both in terms of ‘what decision in history would have been the objectively correct one?’ and ‘what action can I make now to achieve the same goal?’, both of which are really asking “what action do you have to do to win history?”.

This is really a more appropriate attitude for questions you ask a plumber than a historian; it utterly misses the point of ‘history’ as an exercise. One thing I’ve picked up through osmosis is Great Man Theory, in which history is driven forward by heroes with inherently great traits, and while it was developed by Thomas Carlyle, I notice it’s a fairly common assumption; there was something incredible about these particular people and your best hope for being a mover and shaker is to reverse-engineer their decisions and repeat them to the same success. You may be thinking, “But Tristan, this is what you do. This is exactly what you do.” I would agree to the point that I like to think of myself as perfecting this view of the world, which is why I’m intrigued and fascinated by the alternate viewpoint that historians keep pushing. This essay isn’t much original insight; it’s intended to synthesise and digest disparate points into something I can understand.

Ian Kershaw (writer of Hubris and Nemesis, the two-volume biography of Adolf Hitler) put it in the most detail. I don’t remember him ever using the phrase ‘Great Man Theory’, but he essentially describes and rebukes it, expressing moral distaste for the idea that anything about Hitler is great. Hitler’s rise was as much dependent on the system around him as it was his own choices; Kershaw repeatedly notes that had Hitler been born even a decade earlier or later, he would have died an obscure crank. While there were things peculiar about Hitler, his rise says more about the peculiar times he was in than about any power he held as a human being – not just in who and what was being valorised, but in the systems being built and destroyed.

Mary Craig tells a similar story of Mata Hari in A Tangled Web. An untrained dancer having picked up a personal and idiosyncratic combination of moves she ripped from foreign dancers, allowed to reinvent herself as an exotic specimen because that’s what the people of Europe craved at the time; Craig observes that people allowed her to tell fantastic lies about her life because that was all part of the fun at the time, and her success was put down more to her personal charisma and willingness to sexualise herself than her actual abilities. It seems that so-called geniuses who seem to elevate themselves to the stratosphere are actually being elevated by a society that wants what they’re already doing. Meanwhile, in her book SPQR, Mary Beard notes that life for your average peasant in Ancient Rome was pretty much the same regardless of which emperor was actually in charge, whether it was the insane Nero or the Stoic Marcus Aurelius or Julius goddamned Cesar; they still had to get up every day and make pottery.

If I were to put this into a principle – and you know that’s what your boy gotta do – it’s that the historian’s perspective is the choices a person makes are driven by the choices available. It’s not that an individual’s choices don’t matter – no historian I’ve noted or even read would argue that point – it’s that tracking those available choices is the most interesting part of the process. One could also phrase it as a question: what choices were available to that person in that particular moment? It’s hard to judge the people of history for not making choices that weren’t available to them anyway, and it makes it significantly easier to recognise the same choices coming up in a radically different context today with our greater technology and more information. History repeats itself, but never in teh same way twice.

Posted in Features, Other Media | Tagged history, ian kershaw, mary beard, mary craig, nonfiction

About the Author

tristan.jay.nankervis@gmail.com'

Tristan “Drunk Napoleon” Nankervis

Related Posts

Upon learning about the history of her kindThe Taming of the Fair Folk→

Imperialism Is A Little Good Actually – Sapiens: A Brief History Of Humankind by Yuval Noah Harari→

Well, this is in a major motion pictureThe Jarring Anachronism→

Disney Byways: The Florida Project→

  • Comments
  • Popular
  • Most Recent
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleWonderful piece, Sam. It's made…
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleFellow heretic here. I've never…
  • n***********@gmail.com'
    Ruck Cohlchez on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEI wouldn't have called it…
  • j***********@gmail.com'
    Son of Griff on LIFE ITSELFGlad to hear back from…
  • n*********@gmail.com'
    Jake Gittes on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEThis is the single most…
  • “The End” of SAVAGES

    34445 views / Posted November 10, 2014
  • What the fuck did I just watch? SPHERE

    27631 views / Posted March 19, 2015
  • Gordon with Mr. Looper

    Attention Must Be Paid: Will Lee

    26488 views / Posted January 7, 2023
  • The Untalented Mr. Ripley: The Craft of Standup Comedy and the Non-Comedy of TOM MYERS

    25555 views / Posted June 26, 2018
  • Scenic Routes: SHOWGIRLS (1995)

    20301 views / Posted November 20, 2014
  • Bet you weren't expecting this!

    Celebrating the Living: Terry Farrell

    May 28, 2023 / Gillianren
  • One of the only pictures I can find of him

    Attention Must Be Paid: Fred Steiner

    May 27, 2023 / Gillianren
  • Getting the dress form drunk is a solid gag

    Disney Byways: “How to Dance”

    May 26, 2023 / Gillianren
  • The Friday Article Roundup: Blow Off Some Steam

    May 26, 2023 / The Ploughman
  • Yessir, very atomic!: THE 5,000 FINGERS OF DR. T.

    May 25, 2023 / Sam "Burgundy Suit" Scott

Last Tweets

    ©2014 - 2016 The-Solute | Hosted, Developed and Maintained by Bellingham WP LogoBellinghamWP.com.

    Menu

    • Home
    • Who We Are
    • About
    • Privacy
    • Contact Us
    • Login
    Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!