Browse: Home / Year of the Month: Sunil Patel on the Powerlessness of THE AVIATOR

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login

The-SoluteLogo

A Film Site By Lovers of Film

Menu

Skip to content
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Long Reviews
  • News
  • Articles and Opinions
  • Other Media
  • The Friday Article Roundup: For Your Consideration
  • A Quick and Cheap Summary of Roger Corman's 1963
  • Due
  • Film on the Internet: THE VERDICT
  • New on DVD and Blu-Ray

Year of the Month: Sunil Patel on the Powerlessness of THE AVIATOR

Posted By Sam "Burgundy Suit" Scott on June 17, 2020 in Features | Leave a response

I certainly chose an interesting time to get around to watching Martin Scorsese’s Howard Hughes biopic, The Aviator. Sitting on the couch where I have watched dozens of movies in the last three months because I can’t do much else in the middle of a pandemic, I hit “play” and listened to Howard Hughes’ mother spell the word “quarantine.” She cautions her son about cholera and tells him, “You are not safe,” and that sets the tone for the whole movie. It’s a thesis statement we can all relate to right now because germs are invisible monsters that we cannot punch, we cannot pay off, we cannot argue with. They are immune to our attempts to control them, and from the moment we see Howard Hughes barking orders on the set of Hell’s Angels, it’s clear that he is a man who must be in control. Yet he cannot control his own OCD, and so The Aviator becomes a portrayal of simultaneous power and debilitation. It’s strange to watch this movie now and reconcile our disdain for billionaires with our sympathy for his mental illness.

It helps that Leonardo DiCaprio gives one of the best performances of his career. While he does do a Voice — the true signifier of Great Acting — and he’s playing a larger-than-life, charismatic figure, it’s a very lived-in and natural performance. It’s a real feat to come off as charming instead of despicable when you’re casually throwing around millions of dollars to add two more cameras to your fleet of twenty-four. He exudes such confidence in his wealth and power outwardly, but he struggles with this disease inwardly. He never speaks about it or gives it a name — I’m not sure it even had a name at the time — but he communicates it all with his eyes. We can see it in his pointed glance at the peas that a man just touched, thus contaminating the entire plate, including the juicy steak he’d just been enjoying. We can see it in the shaking of his hand as he fights to touch a bathroom doorknob. The camera often puts the audience in Hughes’ POV as well, allowing his focus to become our focus.

DiCaprio’s performance reflects the content of the script, which constantly shows Hughes seizing or losing control in a variety of ways. He tries to control the Katherine Hepburn-Spencer Tracy narrative by paying off a reporter to keep their affair a secret. He seizes control of a hearing by turning questions back on Senator Brewster. He controls poor Professor Fitz by not only drafting him into meteorological servitude by doubling his salary but also making him pose as a mathematician to measure cleavage on the fly. With all his money, he can do whatever he wants, but some things don’t listen to money, like the XF-11 that crashes and nearly kills him (tellingly, Hughes wants people to focus on the two hours it was in the air instead) or the OCD that eventually drives him into complete self-isolation to the point of peeing in bottles. He recites instructions for contactless delivery for milk, and it’s absolutely tragic.

Paranoia feeds into this cycle, as it’s a bit ambiguous why he bugs Ava Gardner’s home (don’t worry, he doesn’t listen to her phone calls, he just reads the transcripts). This is a form of control that’s in line with his conscious behavior, yet it’s far enough over the line that it could be a result of his unconscious behavior. It becomes even more likely that it’s his compulsion seeking control when he starts hallucinating people looking for him and begins losing his grip on reality. It’s terrifying that a man who can throw millions of dollars around like it’s nothing can’t trust his own senses.

The final scene hammers home the whole story, and Martin Scorsese knows DiCaprio can handle that burden. The phrase “the way of the future” spills out of his mouth repeatedly, which, like the paranoia, is absolutely in line with what Hughes believes but is being co-opted by his disease. With every repetition, you can feel DiCaprio fighting to reclaim his words, to regain control by slowing them down so that he’s saying them himself. But, like money itself, a thing with no intrinsic value but what we place on it, that control is just an illusion.

Posted in Features | Tagged 2004, Alec Baldwin, Ava Gardner, Cate Blanchett, John C. Reilly, Jude Law, Kate Beckinsale, Katharine Hepburn, Leonardo diCaprio, Martin Scorsese, Sunil Patel, Willem Dafoe, year of the month

About the Author

Sam “Burgundy Suit” Scott

Sam is a features writer for Looper and studied writing under Kevin Wilson at Sewanee: the University of the South. He’s been a staff writer for The Solute since its launch in 2014 and editor of the Year of the Month series since 2017.

I don’t know how to put this, but he’s kind of a big deal. He has many leather-bound books and his apartment smells of rich mahogany.

Now on Patreon!
https://www.patreon.com/user/creators?u=23744950

  • Tumblr
  • Twitter

Related Posts

The buffet table should be this long at lunch, no longer.A Quick and Cheap Summary of Roger Corman’s 1963→

Year of the Month: HOP ON POP→

Out of context Disney images strikes again!Disney Byways: SAVAGE SAM→

This is what grey horses look likeDisney Byways: MIRACLE OF THE WHITE STALLIONS→

  • Comments
  • Popular
  • Most Recent
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleWonderful piece, Sam. It's made…
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleFellow heretic here. I've never…
  • n***********@gmail.com'
    Ruck Cohlchez on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEI wouldn't have called it…
  • j***********@gmail.com'
    Son of Griff on LIFE ITSELFGlad to hear back from…
  • n*********@gmail.com'
    Jake Gittes on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEThis is the single most…
  • “The End” of SAVAGES

    33163 views / Posted November 10, 2014
  • What the fuck did I just watch? SPHERE

    27247 views / Posted March 19, 2015
  • The Untalented Mr. Ripley: The Craft of Standup Comedy and the Non-Comedy of TOM MYERS

    24483 views / Posted June 26, 2018
  • Scenic Routes: SHOWGIRLS (1995)

    19919 views / Posted November 20, 2014
  • Yvonne, or: CASABLANCA In One Character and Three Scenes

    10884 views / Posted August 21, 2014
  • The Friday Article Roundup: For Your Consideration

    January 27, 2023 / The Ploughman
  • The buffet table should be this long at lunch, no longer.

    A Quick and Cheap Summary of Roger Corman’s 1963

    January 26, 2023 / The Ploughman
  • Is she due?

    Due

    January 25, 2023 / Gillianren
  • Film on the Internet: THE VERDICT

    January 25, 2023 / ZoeZ
  • New on DVD and Blu-Ray

    January 24, 2023 / Greta Taylor

Last Tweets

  • The Friday Article Roundup: For Your Consideration - https://t.co/5z8kfFCCoX, 10 hours ago
  • Roger Corman's 1963 was emblematic of the prolific, imaginative director: https://t.co/RF6FHrbK1R, Jan 26
  • Due - https://t.co/8SeMveLK23, Jan 25

©2014 - 2016 The-Solute | Hosted, Developed and Maintained by Bellingham WP LogoBellinghamWP.com.

Menu

  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!