Browse: Home / Enduring Faithfulness

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login

The-SoluteLogo

A Film Site By Lovers of Film

Menu

Skip to content
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Long Reviews
  • News
  • Articles and Opinions
  • Other Media
  • Disney Byways: THE INCREDIBLE JOURNEY
  • The Friday Article Roundup: For Your Consideration
  • A Quick and Cheap Summary of Roger Corman's 1963
  • Due
  • Film on the Internet: THE VERDICT

Enduring Faithfulness

Posted By Gillianren on June 12, 2019 in Short Articles | Leave a response

We caught the last two episode of Good Omens last night, despite the kids’ best efforts to distract us. (“Look, kid, Mama is hot and tired, and I know you’re too young to understand the concept of Development Hell, but Mama has been waiting a long time for this and you’re making yourself no friends by not being quiet.” Ahem.) The last half-hour or so is a whiplash of back-and-forth from following the book and not, but I was, yes, satisfied with it overall. (I didn’t like their Death; I think the problem is that Neil doesn’t do well writing Terry’s Death. Also, Death is not a tenor.) There were only two lines from the book that I missed not having in the movie, and one of them I only wanted because it reminds me of a famous typo version of it in one edition.

A faithful adaptation, however, is not always a good adaptation. Possibly no work of literature has been played with on film so many times while almost never having a faithful adaptation than Alice in Wonderland, and that’s in part because a truly faithful adaptation is not so much a movie as, well, a dream—the whole point of the book is that it’s just a series of incidents strung together with no true connection that makes sense. Conversely, one of my largest problems with the most famous adaptation of The Wizard of Oz is that the movie makes it all a dream and throws quite a lot of the story overboard.

I know of at least one adaptation that I consider to work as well as it does because it threw out the worst bits of the book it’s based on—the book is dreadful, but the movie of The Lost World is merely mediocre. It’s clear Michael Crichton was trying to figure out everything that worked in Jurassic Park and just copy it, and he was wrong and also did what had worked badly the second time. Williams Goldman’s book of The Princess Bride is already supposed to be “the good parts edition” of a book that canonically must be about twice the length, and even he knew that bits had to be trimmed to make the movie a workable length. Though even there, there’s one line from the book I want back.

The secret seems to be knowing what you want to do. What is the point of your adaptation? What story are you telling? Why are you telling it? Why are you making the changes? And frankly, once you’ve made enough of them, why are you claiming to have adapted the work in the first place? (See, for example—or probably don’t—The Lawnmower Man, which has basically nothing to do with the Stephen King short story except the name.) If you’re trying to cash in on name recognition, that is not a good enough reason.

From what I can tell, the main reason Neil Gaiman wanted to adapt Good Omens was that an adaptation of it was something Terry Pratchett had wanted very much, and this was a thing he could do for his friend. And that is beautiful. That is a reason to choose to adapt something, and to do the best job at it you can. A little research could find lots of times where the author of the original work wasn’t the best person to adapt it to the screen—even leaving out the collaborative work issue that we have here. But I do think there are also lots of examples of very good adaptations, by original authors and by others, and I definitely think this is one of them.

Help pay for my Amazon Prime so I can watch more stuff like Good Omens; support my Patreon or Ko-fi!

Posted in Short Articles | Tagged Adaptations

About the Author

gillianmadeira@hotmail.com'

Gillianren

Gillianren is a forty-something bipolar woman living in the Pacific Northwest after growing up in Los Angeles County. She and her boyfriend have one son and one daughter, and she gave a daughter up for adoption. She fills her days by watching her local library system’s DVD collection in alphabetical order, watching everything that looks interesting. She particularly enjoys pre-Code films, blaxploitation, and live-action Disney movies of the ’60s and ’70s. She has a Patreon account at https://www.patreon.com/gillianren

Related Posts

"I'm a pilot! How crazy is that!"The Friday Article Roundup: Will That Fly?→

Yup, this is Calamity JaneIn Name Only→

Superconductor. That's all I've got. I'm tired.The Friday Article Roundup: Personal Conductor→

A pointed contractFaust–You Know, For Kids→

  • Comments
  • Popular
  • Most Recent
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleWonderful piece, Sam. It's made…
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleFellow heretic here. I've never…
  • n***********@gmail.com'
    Ruck Cohlchez on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEI wouldn't have called it…
  • j***********@gmail.com'
    Son of Griff on LIFE ITSELFGlad to hear back from…
  • n*********@gmail.com'
    Jake Gittes on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEThis is the single most…
  • “The End” of SAVAGES

    33172 views / Posted November 10, 2014
  • What the fuck did I just watch? SPHERE

    27249 views / Posted March 19, 2015
  • The Untalented Mr. Ripley: The Craft of Standup Comedy and the Non-Comedy of TOM MYERS

    24501 views / Posted June 26, 2018
  • Scenic Routes: SHOWGIRLS (1995)

    19920 views / Posted November 20, 2014
  • Yvonne, or: CASABLANCA In One Character and Three Scenes

    10889 views / Posted August 21, 2014
  • Wilderness travelers

    Disney Byways: THE INCREDIBLE JOURNEY

    January 27, 2023 / Gillianren
  • The Friday Article Roundup: For Your Consideration

    January 27, 2023 / The Ploughman
  • The buffet table should be this long at lunch, no longer.

    A Quick and Cheap Summary of Roger Corman’s 1963

    January 26, 2023 / The Ploughman
  • Is she due?

    Due

    January 25, 2023 / Gillianren
  • Film on the Internet: THE VERDICT

    January 25, 2023 / ZoeZ

Last Tweets

  • Disney Byways: THE INCREDIBLE JOURNEY - https://t.co/CdEiRVrbHc, 17 hours ago
  • The Friday Article Roundup: For Your Consideration - https://t.co/5z8kfFCCoX, Jan 27
  • Roger Corman's 1963 was emblematic of the prolific, imaginative director: https://t.co/RF6FHrbK1R, Jan 26

©2014 - 2016 The-Solute | Hosted, Developed and Maintained by Bellingham WP LogoBellinghamWP.com.

Menu

  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!