Browse: Home / Taco Break: Four ways of speaking through THE SIMPSONS (by Miller)

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login

The-SoluteLogo

A Film Site By Lovers of Film

Menu

Skip to content
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Long Reviews
  • News
  • Articles and Opinions
  • Other Media
  • Tales from the Backlog: Vomas on 1970
  • The Friday Article Roundup: Blowing Smoke
  • Year of the Month: Reconstructing HUSBANDS
  • Flashback Comics Rack: Highlights of December 1970
  • Lunch Links: EVIL DEMON GOLFBALL FROM HELL!!!

Taco Break: Four ways of speaking through THE SIMPSONS (by Miller)

Posted By The Ploughman on June 29, 2023 in Short Articles | Leave a response

We talk through pop culture. Don’t worry, I can use the royal “we” here because it’s true — just ask the annoying person who wouldn’t stop saying “Sit on it!” in the late 70s or “Yeah, baby!” in the late 90s. And at this site, I can get even more specific: We talk through The Simpsons. No other single work has infiltrated our language, and I would argue the broader language as well. That’s in part because of the sheer volume of material (which is not even half the actual output of the show at this point, unless people are dropping lines from seasons 13 to 34) and the variety of characters delivering it. But I think the manner of material is a major factor as well. There is a level of nuance within these words — and not-quite words — that makes them endlessly adaptable. Here, courtesy of Krusty the Klown, are four ways Simpsonsic language has become an indispensable part of communication.

  1. The Line

This is in some ways the most sophisticated Simpsonic device but also the least unique. The Line is something so clever that it can stand on its own, outside of Simpsons context. “Do we really want to live in a world without television? I think the survivors would envy the dead!” Krusty exclaims — this is because his medium is being threatened by a psychotic former sidekick with an atomic bomb, but that is unnecessary to appreciate the Line’s dark wit. You could use it as an epigraph, its brilliance speaks for itself — but to use it, you must first know it through the show. Many great works produce Lines, the ones The Simpsons contributes are part of that linguistic pool we pull from to add an outside voice to our own.

  1. The Concept

If the Line is a closed loop, ornamental, the Concept opens outward. It can be a word or a phrase, perhaps new or maybe just perfectly distilled. “Oops — I said the quiet part loud and the loud part quiet,” Krusty bemoans, and the first half of that formulation has become shorthand for describing a failed or overt dog whistle (itself a metaphorical concept). Similar to the Line, the Concept can come from any art — Seinfeld was arguably superior to The Simpsons in coining them — but it has more use and extends the world of the show into different contexts. It’s the difference between knowing the Lines of Hamlet’s “To be or not to be” soliloquy and mentioning suffering slings and arrows. Like Shakespeare’s words, Simpsons language seeps into use in different ways.

  1. The Reference

This is the all-purpose description of Simpsons-speak. Technically the Line and the Concept fall under this umbrella, although the Line is more of a citation and the Concept’s utility means people will use it without knowing its provenance, as Gillianren discusses in an excellent piece on orphaned jokes. I think the Reference is something different — it is a shibboleth, a way for people in the know to communicate using words and phrases that may be unique on their own but imbued with meaning via the show. “I heartily endorse this event or product” is the most generic of phrases but that is the joke of Krusty’s mercenary delivery, a person dropping it in reference to a real-life celebrity shilling crap or their own lack of enthusiasm regarding something is a way of speaking covertly. Of joking with the people who will get it. The Reference may not have the reach of the Concept but it makes the stronger connection, and those connections wind up expanding usage as well. It is a private language that anyone can join, and more than anything has kept the broader language of the Simpsons in circulation.

  1. The Utterance

But there is something perhaps more private. The Simpsons’ language is spoken as well as written, and the voice actors’ deliveries have made their own contributions off the page. The most famous of these of course is “d’oh!”, which Dan Castellenata transformed from the scripted [annoyed grunt] into a word that is now in the dictionary. “D’oh” is eternal, but what I may use even more as I get older is Castellanata-as-Krusty’s weary “ugggggggggh.” It’s the sound of dreading something you know you can’t avoid, of seeing an expectation of misfortune confirmed, of making a hefty down payment on future misery. It’s great! Although I have the decency to not do it around other people. The Utterance is a reaction but it’s not a thoughtless one. It’s a way of speaking to myself in a familiar voice, falling back on a language that has made me laugh before and is helpful as a way of processing something now. 

What are your favorite Lines, Concepts, References, Utterances? How do you speak Simpsons, and pop culture in general?

Posted in Short Articles | Tagged Miller, Taco Break, The Simpsons

About the Author

gemofpurestray@gmail.com'

The Ploughman

Related Posts

Taco Break: Overstaying Their Welcome→

Year of the Month: Miller on GOAT→

It's got confessional interviews and everything? Bleh!Taco Break: Low Concepts→

Eerily, Roy Schieder ended up there avoiding a mobster named Fat Tony, while Homer had a secretary named Lincoln.Taco Break: Seed to Harvest (by Miller)→

  • Comments
  • Popular
  • Most Recent
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleWonderful piece, Sam. It's made…
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleFellow heretic here. I've never…
  • n***********@gmail.com'
    Ruck Cohlchez on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEI wouldn't have called it…
  • j***********@gmail.com'
    Son of Griff on LIFE ITSELFGlad to hear back from…
  • n*********@gmail.com'
    Jake Gittes on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEThis is the single most…
  • “The End” of SAVAGES

    35463 views / Posted November 10, 2014
  • What the fuck did I just watch? SPHERE

    28155 views / Posted March 19, 2015
  • The Untalented Mr. Ripley: The Craft of Standup Comedy and the Non-Comedy of TOM MYERS

    26768 views / Posted June 26, 2018
  • Gordon with Mr. Looper

    Attention Must Be Paid: Will Lee

    26632 views / Posted January 7, 2023
  • Scenic Routes: SHOWGIRLS (1995)

    20692 views / Posted November 20, 2014
  • Tales from the Backlog: Vomas on 1970

    September 29, 2023 / Sam "Burgundy Suit" Scott
  • The Solute does not endorse the cool vice of sssssmokin'.

    The Friday Article Roundup: Blowing Smoke

    September 29, 2023 / The Ploughman
  • Year of the Month: Reconstructing HUSBANDS

    September 28, 2023 / John Bruni
  • Flashback Comics Rack: Highlights of December 1970

    September 28, 2023 / Sam "Burgundy Suit" Scott
  • Years later, Johnson would use these techniques to film Star Wars actors interacting with golfballs that would be replaced by Porgs or some shit.

    Lunch Links: EVIL DEMON GOLFBALL FROM HELL!!!

    September 28, 2023 / The Ploughman

Last Tweets

    ©2014 - 2016 The-Solute | Hosted, Developed and Maintained by Bellingham WP LogoBellinghamWP.com.

    Menu

    • Home
    • Who We Are
    • About
    • Privacy
    • Contact Us
    • Login
    Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!