Browse: Home / Firefly, “Serenity” (Film)

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login

The-SoluteLogo

A Film Site By Lovers of Film

Menu

Skip to content
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Long Reviews
  • News
  • Articles and Opinions
  • Other Media
  • Celebrating the Living: Conan O'Brien
  • Attention Must Be Paid: Ninón Sevilla
  • Disney Byways: THE INCREDIBLE JOURNEY
  • The Friday Article Roundup: For Your Consideration
  • A Quick and Cheap Summary of Roger Corman's 1963

Firefly, “Serenity” (Film)

Posted By Tristan "Drunk Napoleon" Nankervis on November 27, 2017 in Long Reviews | 22 Responses

“Do you know what your sin is, Mal?”
“Aw, hell. I’m a fan of all seven.”

“… it’s about the right to be wrong. It’s about the idea that you cannot impose your way of thinking on people, even if your way of thinking is more enlightened and better than theirs. It’s just simply not how human beings are. And you take that further and you say the idea of sin is in fact outmoded, is in fact more archaic than anything that Mal believes in. When he says, ‘I’m a fan of all seven,’ […] he’s saying that sin is just what people are; it’s been codified, it’s been given a name, but all of those things we take as faults are also the source of pleasure and decency, and we should perhaps rethink it.”

That first quote is from the film, and that second quote is from Joss Whedon’s director’s commentary, and it tells us two things: 1) Whedon has heard of subtext but has trouble grasping the practicalities, and 2) that Whedon is writing a manifesto. More than any of his other work, Serenity is a step-by-step explanation of what Whedon thinks is right and wrong. Television gives him the scope to find nuance and character within his worldview, but film forces him to do one thing and one thing only, and so I think Serenity is the result of him cramming an entire TV show’s worth of ideas into two hours; this is his Zodiac, the purest expression of Whedon.

You can see how his need to get out a moral statement in the way that he sacrifices both plot and character for it; many people have noticed that Mal, Simon, and Jayne’s relationships all seem to have been reset, and beloved commentor DJ JD has noted that the scifi explanation for the Reavers we get doesn’t completely hold together with what we saw in the show. And some of the plot itself runs on luck – we’ve never heard about Mal’s injury moving his pressure point until after it became convenient, which is how Mal defeats the Operative, which is how he gets off his big Heroic Speech at the end.

“I won’t get et! You shoot me if they take me!”
[Mal aims his gun] “Well don’t shoot me first!”

It’s not all bad though. The need for efficiency means that the movie just blasts through story, never losing pace and never getting boring – the opening twenty minutes are three (or four, if you count the oner that introduces us to the crew) sequences that introduces us to the Verse in general, River and Simon’s origin,  the Operative, and the day-to-day life of Serenity, leading us into the plot without missing a beat. The filmmaking and action, never Firefly or Whedon’s greatest strengths, are all kicked up a notch; there’s no time to waste and nothing is without purpose.

“Zoe, ship is yours. Remember, if anything happens to me, or you don’t hear from me within the hour, you take this ship and you come and you rescue me!”

Where Whedon’s desires, the needs of the story, and the enforced discipline all really come together is in the Operative. I’ve been complaining in my coverage of the show the whole time about the presentation of the Alliance as cartoon bad guys who can be easily dismissed just on the basis that they’re uncool assholes. By reducing him to the core ideals Whedon is attacking, he creates both a legitimate threat (the Operative cannot be argued or humiliated into submission) and a genuine argument to engage with. The Operative doesn’t do what he does because he’s too stupid to know better; he honestly believes he’s doing a necessary thing. Chiwetel Ejiofor always has a pulp sensibility about him (probably why he gets cast as the hero in things like 2012), and he brings a confident purity to the Operative that elevates it further. The only way to destroy him is to destroy his ideals, and it’ll take a lot to do that; even if you don’t agree with him, he’s extremely cool.

“You want to run this ship?”
“Yes!”
“Well… You can’t.”

The thought that I keep coming back to, though, is that Whedon is being a hypocrite. The movie opens with River denouncing an Alliance representative as ‘meddling’, and her response is “We’re not trying to tell people what to think. We’re just trying to show them how,” which just about sums up my description of Whedon’s intentions, and in fact is how Mal defeats the Operative – give him the same information as Mal, and the Operative comes around to Mal’s point of view. I presume this is the reaction Whedon was expecting; that the viewer, given all the information of the show and the film, would peacefully come around to an anti-Alliance anti-authoritarian worldview.

“And are you willing to die for that belief?”
“I am.”
[ownage] “‘Course that ain’t exactly Plan A.”

But the hypocrisy doesn’t actually bother me as much as the Sisyphean uselessness of Whedon’s goal. On one level, you have people like Miller, who totally reject Whedon’s philosophy on the face of it and all the expressions thereof; on another, you have people like me, who go out of their way to hear out and sympathise with alien viewpoints, and who even sympathises with Whedon’s viewpoint specifically… and still comes out disagreeing, or at least finding holes in the way he presents it. I often draw on stories as a how-to guide to living, but consciously writing a how-to guide relies on your audience being at the right time and the right place to accept what you’re going to hear.

Also, it relies on you being someone worth listening to. I suspect the Operative wouldn’t fuck women behind his wife’s back and then lie about it.

SCATTERED THOUGHTS

  • The Firefly Verse is much filthier and grungier in the film than in the show – the lighting is edgier, the clothing more ragged, and everything looks more used. Normally I prefer that sort of thing, but I prefer the show’s niceness.
  • Glenn Howerton is the guy Mal shoots during the opening sequence. I leave it to you to make the It’s Always Sunny In The Verse jokes.
  • Ruck Cohlchez observed that he couldn’t unsee the women in the show as male fantasy figures; I found it nice in the film that it felt more like Simon was the fantasy figure for the more easy-to-identify-with Kaylee. “To hell with this! I’m gonna live!”
Posted in Long Reviews | Tagged Adam Baldwin, alan tudyk, Firefly, Gina Torres, jewel staite, Joss Whedon, morena baccarin, Nathan Fillion, Ownage, Ron Glass, sean maher, summer glau

About the Author

tristan.jay.nankervis@gmail.com'

Tristan “Drunk Napoleon” Nankervis

Related Posts

Film on the Internet: Lydia Lomeli on KILL BILL VOL. 2→

Being A Fan Of Firefly In 2022, or: A Nine Year Late Response To “How To Be A Fan Of Problematic Things”→

Year of the Month: Miller on HARD TIMES→

The most badass carpenter since 33 AD.The Friday Article Roundup: News for Nerds→

  • Comments
  • Popular
  • Most Recent
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleWonderful piece, Sam. It's made…
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleFellow heretic here. I've never…
  • n***********@gmail.com'
    Ruck Cohlchez on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEI wouldn't have called it…
  • j***********@gmail.com'
    Son of Griff on LIFE ITSELFGlad to hear back from…
  • n*********@gmail.com'
    Jake Gittes on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEThis is the single most…
  • “The End” of SAVAGES

    33203 views / Posted November 10, 2014
  • What the fuck did I just watch? SPHERE

    27253 views / Posted March 19, 2015
  • The Untalented Mr. Ripley: The Craft of Standup Comedy and the Non-Comedy of TOM MYERS

    24545 views / Posted June 26, 2018
  • Scenic Routes: SHOWGIRLS (1995)

    19931 views / Posted November 20, 2014
  • Yvonne, or: CASABLANCA In One Character and Three Scenes

    10895 views / Posted August 21, 2014
  • In the year 2000 . . . .

    Celebrating the Living: Conan O’Brien

    January 29, 2023 / Gillianren
  • I mean, shame about the rest of the movie, though.

    Attention Must Be Paid: Ninón Sevilla

    January 28, 2023 / Gillianren
  • Wilderness travelers

    Disney Byways: THE INCREDIBLE JOURNEY

    January 27, 2023 / Gillianren
  • The Friday Article Roundup: For Your Consideration

    January 27, 2023 / The Ploughman
  • The buffet table should be this long at lunch, no longer.

    A Quick and Cheap Summary of Roger Corman’s 1963

    January 26, 2023 / The Ploughman

Last Tweets

  • Celebrating the Living: Conan O’Brien - https://t.co/JUXtIery4k, 9 hours ago
  • Attention Must Be Paid: Ninón Sevilla - https://t.co/NimFiOk7QW, Jan 28
  • Disney Byways: THE INCREDIBLE JOURNEY - https://t.co/CdEiRVrbHc, Jan 28

©2014 - 2016 The-Solute | Hosted, Developed and Maintained by Bellingham WP LogoBellinghamWP.com.

Menu

  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!