Browse: Home / Year Of The Month: Kansas City Confidential

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login

The-SoluteLogo

A Film Site By Lovers of Film

Menu

Skip to content
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Long Reviews
  • News
  • Articles and Opinions
  • Other Media
  • Review: MISSING
  • Sometimes the Narrative Is Pure
  • The Solute Book Club: FURNACE (An Introduction)
  • TV on the Internet: PAUL T. GOLDMAN
  • Year of the Month: DRY SUMMER (SUSUZ YAZ)

Year Of The Month: Kansas City Confidential

Posted By Tristan "Drunk Napoleon" Nankervis on April 26, 2021 in Features, Short Articles | Leave a response

This is an archetypal film noir. I don’t think of myself as someone well-versed in the genre, at least yet, but it fits with the idea of it I’ve built up with what I have seen – a stylised thriller in which a crime billows out into a city causing people to have to commit even more crimes. The thing that fascinates me about the genre is how much of it is based on dramatic principles – even when the story is about someone solving a mystery, more often than not the audience has the answer ahead of time (which is true here – we see Mr Big planning and executing the heist before we ever meet the patsy caught up in its wake) and we’re here to see people acting with limited information in ways that will come back on them. I suspect this is the influence of Alfred Hitchcock – even if these directors didn’t know about his basic principles of thriller filmmaking, they definitely picked them up from observation and put them into practice. What gets really interesting is the way this interacts with the motivation of the filmmaking; noir movies weren’t a deliberate cultural movement, they were a product churned out to make money. Kansas City Confidential was the twenty-second film by director Phil Karson, and was intended to be the first of thirteen pictures produced by the prolific Edward Small for Associated Players and Producers; nobody here had anything to prove or some grand statement to make, they just wanted to make a picture that would sell.

It’s worth comparing to the science fiction movies of the time, also motivated by money and also products churned out by the boatload, but to my eye much less artistically successful – I like watching them, but it’s always for the camp value and I don’t know if there’s any I would actually call a good movie, and there are almost none that have had a genuine lasting value the way films like this (or Detour, or The Hitch-Hiker) have. What gets me most are how similar the genres are in terms of acting and dialogue; boldly declarative, with every statement either a command or a moral judgement. The difference is the stories of noir almost force actors to deliver a consistent thought process underneath that; one of my favourite parts of KCC is how John Payne conveys his character’s resolve stiffening. It’s most obvious in his opening scenes, when he sheds his chaotic panic as he sees his options reduced to one simple path of revenge, but you can see it at different points throughout the film as he alternately panics and calculates. The scifi films are closer in structure to pornography, except you’re sitting through interminable dialogue to get to campy special effects instead of sex scenes; their value comes in the weird and wonderful ways they can kill time. It’s a distinction in nine-to-five working attitude comparable to Ronnie Gardocki vs Steve Billings – the noirs were trying to entertain an audience as efficiently as possible while the scifi films were trying to get in and out in an hour and change.

Posted in Features, Short Articles | Tagged kansas city confidential, noir, Ownage

About the Author

tristan.jay.nankervis@gmail.com'

Tristan “Drunk Napoleon” Nankervis

Related Posts

Film on the Internet: Lydia Lomeli on KILL BILL VOL. 2→

Year of the Month: Miller on HARD TIMES→

The Solute Book Club: If On A Winter’s Night A Traveler… – An Introduction→

MISBEHAVIN’: THE DRAMATIC COMEDY OF SUCCESSION & THE RIGHTEOUS GEMSTONES→

  • Comments
  • Popular
  • Most Recent
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleWonderful piece, Sam. It's made…
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleFellow heretic here. I've never…
  • n***********@gmail.com'
    Ruck Cohlchez on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEI wouldn't have called it…
  • j***********@gmail.com'
    Son of Griff on LIFE ITSELFGlad to hear back from…
  • n*********@gmail.com'
    Jake Gittes on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEThis is the single most…
  • “The End” of SAVAGES

    33258 views / Posted November 10, 2014
  • What the fuck did I just watch? SPHERE

    27269 views / Posted March 19, 2015
  • The Untalented Mr. Ripley: The Craft of Standup Comedy and the Non-Comedy of TOM MYERS

    24596 views / Posted June 26, 2018
  • Scenic Routes: SHOWGIRLS (1995)

    19948 views / Posted November 20, 2014
  • Yvonne, or: CASABLANCA In One Character and Three Scenes

    10920 views / Posted August 21, 2014
  • I should really be finish this post for The Solute but I can't stop watching kidnapping videos.

    Review: MISSING

    February 2, 2023 / The Ploughman
  • Don't they look comfy?

    Sometimes the Narrative Is Pure

    February 1, 2023 / Gillianren
  • The Solute Book Club: FURNACE (An Introduction)

    February 1, 2023 / CM Crockford
  • TV on the Internet: PAUL T. GOLDMAN

    February 1, 2023 / Ruck Cohlchez
  • Year of the Month: DRY SUMMER (SUSUZ YAZ)

    January 31, 2023 / Sam "Burgundy Suit" Scott

Last Tweets

  • MISSING is a twisty mystery in the style of 2018's SEARCHING. https://t.co/SG8DxBlxv9, 12 hours ago
  • Sometimes the Narrative Is Pure - https://t.co/EMnSPhPe3P, Feb 1
  • The Solute Book Club: FURNACE (An Introduction) - https://t.co/nM1pl98Pee, Feb 1

©2014 - 2016 The-Solute | Hosted, Developed and Maintained by Bellingham WP LogoBellinghamWP.com.

Menu

  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!