Browse: Home / Year of the Month: Sunil Patel on LA RONDE

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login

The-SoluteLogo

A Film Site By Lovers of Film

Menu

Skip to content
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Long Reviews
  • News
  • Articles and Opinions
  • Other Media
  • The Friday Article Roundup: The Truth is In Here
  • Lunch Links: Schwarzfahrer
  • Websites on the Internet: THE SOLUTE
  • New on DVD and Blu-Ray
  • Movie Gifts Holidays 2024

Year of the Month: Sunil Patel on LA RONDE

Posted By Sam "Burgundy Suit" Scott on August 5, 2020 in Features | Leave a response

One day on The Dissolve Facebook group, I listed several traits I found appealing in the films of Wong Kar-wai — cinematic portrayals of loneliness and heartbreak; interconnectedness of humanity, with chance encounters and relationships with strangers having profound effects; the loving use of music, be it orchestral or pop; unconventional narrative structure — and asked for films and/or directors I might enjoy. Longtime friend Sean Gallagher recommended the work of Max Ophüls, and so La Ronde got on my radar. Sure enough, the film did do the things I like in the way I like them done! It’s the story of a series of love affairs adapted from a controversial play about a series of love affairs, but Ophüls and Jacques Natanson add a Master of Ceremonies character who ties the stories together and, in my opinion, elevates the source material. Unless it undermines the source material. It all depends on what you want to get out of a story that follows a consecutive, circular chain of lovers in 1900 Vienna.

In the first scene of Arthur Schnitzler’s play, a sex worker propositions a soldier, and that soldier links to a chambermaid, who links to a young gentleman, until we eventually get to a count, who links back to the original sex worker to complete the circle. As originally presented, these encounters are pure happenstance, and it’s simply whimsical chance that you could actually connect these characters via their love affairs so circuitously. In the film, however, the Master of Ceremonies — wonderfully portrayed by Anton Walbrook, a charming, magnetic screen presence — specifically tells the sex worker which soldier to sleep with. She initiates the circle on his behalf, so in this version, the MC orchestrates the whole affair of the affairs. Does he perhaps represent God, the true architect of happenstance? Or the writer, who bears responsibility for the fate of his characters?

In the play, the connections between these people from different stations in life occur on their own, but in the film, the Master of Ceremonies occasionally intervenes to ensure that the circle continues. He propels the Chambermaid two months into the future — a lovely device I wish Ophüls had used more to enhance the dreamlike nature of the proceedings — and then keeps a visitor from interrupting her tryst with the Young Gentleman. It’s an amusing scene, but quite pointed — had the MC not been there, those two would not have been able to do their business, which would be quite a shame because, uh, their flirtatious build-up is one of the sexiest things I’ve seen onscreen that involved no actual sex. Let them bone, please. Later, the MC waits on the Husband and the Young Girl in a restaurant, going so far as to give the husband a pep talk in the middle of his date.

Throughout the film, the Master of Ceremonies sings a very hummable song about his characters turning, turning on the carousel of love, so it’s clear that he treats them as characters in the story we are witnessing, the story he is ensuring occurs. But are they then not reflections of real life, as intended by Schnitzler in his play? Of course, the characters were merely characters in the play as well, but Schnitzler never called attention to it.

Ophüls crafts a deliberately cinematic adaptation of a theatrical work; the Master of Ceremonies quips that they could be on a film set as, in fact, we see a camera and lighting equipment. Later we even see the orchestra playing the score. In the greatest meta moment of the film, the MC censors a sex scene by literally cutting the film in front of us. All of these touches highlight the artifice of the entire enterprise, so can this reflect the truth of life if it’s so clearly contrived?

This fundamental difference between the film and play allows for some interesting discussions of how we relate to fiction and the distinction between “realism” or “authenticity” and “truth.” I can’t imagine liking the play as much as the film because the Master of the Ceremonies makes the entire movie for me; I love omniscient narrators and find Ophüls’s take on the device delightful. The film opens with the Master of Ceremonies unable to decide whether he is the author, an accomplice, or a passer-by, declaring that he merely represents our desire to know everything, to see from every perspective — he’s the narrative glue that, in the play, we would have to construct ourselves. Wouldn’t it be lovely if we could trust in such narrative glue in reality? Whether it’s a mellifluously voiced Frenchman or cosmic forces beyond our comprehension, it is comforting to think that there is a guiding hand that holds the world together, creating circular narratives, circles that interlock to form a chain of humanity.

Posted in Features | Tagged 1950, France, Max Ophüls, Sunil Patel, year of the month

About the Author

Sam “Burgundy Suit” Scott

Sam is a features writer for Looper and studied writing under Kevin Wilson at Sewanee: the University of the South. He’s been a staff writer for The Solute since its launch in 2014 and editor of the Year of the Month series since 2017.

I don’t know how to put this, but he’s kind of a big deal. He has many leather-bound books and his apartment smells of rich mahogany.

Now on Patreon!
https://www.patreon.com/user/creators?u=23744950

  • Tumblr
  • Twitter

Related Posts

Coors, the official beer of drinking in a little league dugout.Year of the Month: THE BAD NEWS BEARS→

Year of the Month: FALL (2022)→

No One Likes Chili Dogs That Much: Persia on GONE GIRL→

Then gaze out the window and draw a peen on the board: DON’T TRUST THE B—- IN APT. 23→

  • Comments
  • Popular
  • Most Recent
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleWonderful piece, Sam. It's made…
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleFellow heretic here. I've never…
  • n***********@gmail.com'
    Ruck Cohlchez on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEI wouldn't have called it…
  • j***********@gmail.com'
    Son of Griff on LIFE ITSELFGlad to hear back from…
  • n*********@gmail.com'
    Jake Gittes on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEThis is the single most…
  • “The End” of SAVAGES

    38395 views / Posted November 10, 2014
  • The Untalented Mr. Ripley: The Craft of Standup Comedy and the Non-Comedy of TOM MYERS

    30744 views / Posted June 26, 2018
  • What the fuck did I just watch? SPHERE

    30350 views / Posted March 19, 2015
  • Gordon with Mr. Looper

    Attention Must Be Paid: Will Lee

    27652 views / Posted January 7, 2023
  • Scenic Routes: SHOWGIRLS (1995)

    23356 views / Posted November 20, 2014
  • The truth is FAR out there.

    The Friday Article Roundup: The Truth is In Here

    December 6, 2024 / The Ploughman
  • This is a way lower res image than I will be allowed to get away with at the new site.

    Lunch Links: Schwarzfahrer

    December 5, 2024 / The Ploughman
  • Websites on the Internet: THE SOLUTE

    December 4, 2024 / ZoeZ
  • New on DVD and Blu-Ray

    December 3, 2024 / Greta Taylor
  • Movie Gifts Holidays 2024

    December 2, 2024 / The Ploughman

Last Tweets

    ©2014 - 2016 The-Solute | Hosted, Developed and Maintained by Bellingham WP LogoBellinghamWP.com.

    Menu

    • Home
    • Who We Are
    • About
    • Privacy
    • Contact Us
    • Login
    Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!