Browse: Home / Year of the Month: Sunil Patel on THE DIRTY DOZEN

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login

The-SoluteLogo

A Film Site By Lovers of Film

Menu

Skip to content
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Long Reviews
  • News
  • Articles and Opinions
  • Other Media
  • Disney Byways: Disney's Lawyers
  • The Solute Book Club: THE DAUGHTER OF TIME (by Casper)
  • The Friday Article Roundup: Plain as the Nose
  • SUPER MARIO BROS. 1993 and the Rise of Feminism: An Intersectional Femivision article by Cori Domschot
  • Miller's 2022 Double Features: Wake Up and Live, Eat Shit and Die

Year of the Month: Sunil Patel on THE DIRTY DOZEN

Posted By Sam "Burgundy Suit" Scott on June 29, 2022 in Features | Leave a response

“So that’s it, huh? We’re some kinda dirty dozen?” says absolutely no one in The Dirty Dozen, unfortunately, though someone does get to say the title of the movie. It was impossible for me to watch this classic 1967 World War II film in 2022 without thinking of (The) Suicide Squad, especially since both David Ayer and James Gunn cited the movie as inspirations for their films and James Gunn’s sequel/reboot paid homage in its poster. The comics team actually predates even the original 1965 novel by E.M. Nathanson, having first appeared in the pages of The Brave and the Bold in 1959, but it was John Ostrander in 1987 who created the concept the more recent films are based on, in which Amanda Waller sends supervillains out on suicide missions for the government…a concept that, yes, Ostrander absolutely took from The Dirty Dozen. Robert Aldrich’s film had a good twenty years before it became inextricably associated with DC Comics and almost fifty years before a much-maligned film cemented that pop culture association. Not having read any of the comics but having seen and enjoyed both movies — one a great deal more than the other — I found it fascinating to observe the key differences that made The Dirty Dozen a much more interesting execution of this great premise.

Given that the Suicide Squad comprises comic book supervillains, one naturally assumes them to be killers, and by one I do mean me, as I’m not familiar with every single member of every single iteration so it’s entirely possible there are people in Belle Reve for tax fraud or whatever. Regardless, even if some inmates are on “death row,” on a metatextual level, these characters aren’t in huge danger of being executed because why would a comic kill off a supervillain so banally? On the other hand, a minority of the Dirty Dozen actually face the noose for having killed someone — several of them for sympathetic reasons — so I was surprised to discover that so many of the team members were simply serving decades of hard labor. For the murderers, perhaps getting killed on a mission was preferable to the noose, but that seems like an awfully big risk for the people who aren’t actually facing death for their crimes. Especially when the penalty for failing out of the team is hanging, not just being sent back to prison. What the fuck are these terms? It’s easy to accept the comic book fantasy as just that, but the way it’s originally presented provides real resonance with regards to the prison system and the desperation it puts on the people inside it.

One of the manifestations of this desperation in the Suicide Squad is that each member has a bomb implanted in their neck that Amanda Waller can detonate if they get out of line. This is no empty threat either, as Waller will not hesitate to blow up the head of anyone who attempts to escape. This may seem extreme, and yet somehow it’s less extreme than in the Dirty Dozen, where if anyone escapes, everyone is punished! (With eventual hanging, not immediate explosion.) The film emphasizes the severity of this threat in a scene where Dozen members Jefferson, Wladislaw, and Posey must keep Franko (John  Cassavetes) from escaping because hell if they’re going to let him get them all killed. This policy forces each individual to think about the consequences their actions have on the rest of the team, which encourages a camaraderie that doesn’t build naturally when you view your squad as individual flight risks.

Given my experience with the Suicide Squad, I assumed that the members of the Dirty Dozen brought a similar assortment of skills to the team, like having a sword that traps the souls of its victims or being able to climb anything, but…they don’t! They’re just assholes! That’s what they bring to the team. Posey (Clint Walker) may be physically imposing, but no one has an inherent advantage that makes them suited to go on a mission, which means they must undergo rigorous training. I wish we got to see more of the training to see how they became fit for duty, but the film’s uninterested in showing us that part of their development, more concerned with developing their relationships to each other. Instead, when we see them participate in a wargame, we see how far they’ve come. Although they were chosen because of the meanness of their character and their expendability, they do live up to Major John Reisman (Lee Marvin)’s assessment of their capabilities as potential soldiers.

But ultimately what makes the Dirty Dozen so much more interesting is that unlike Waller, Reisman did not choose to lead this team and he actually cares about people. You can see it in his reaction to a hanging in the first scene; he truly believes that giving prisoners an option other than the noose is good for them. He constantly stands up for his soldiers against his superiors, and even when it seems like he’s being kind of a dick — refusing to let them shave or bathe with hot water like the rest of the troop — he does it because he understands that by making himself a common enemy, he can mold the ragtag group of prisoners into an actual unit. Most importantly — and very much to my surprise — he actually goes on the mission with them! He puts his own life on the line alongside them, and that makes him a true leader they can believe in. I recently rewatched Army of Darkness, and I’ve seen few other movies that hinged almost entirely on one actor’s performance, but for my money, The Dirty Dozen absolutely does not work without Lee Marvin’s strong, nuanced, gentle, clever, utterly humane performance as Reisman.

I did enjoy Suicide Squad, flawed though it was, and I really liked The Suicide Squad, so watching The Dirty Dozen helped me place these films (and their comic book origins) in the greater conversation. Of course, even The Dirty Dozen owes its “gather a group of disparate individuals for a common goal” conceit to Seven Samurai, but that would be an entirely different essay. For now, I just want to appreciate the malleability of a single idea that can encompass a bunch of assholes blowing up Nazis and a bunch of assholes blowing up a giant alien starfish.

Posted in Features | Tagged 1967, Charles Bronson, Donald Sutherland, Ernest Borgnine, George Kennedy, Jim Brown, John Cassavetes, Lee Marvin, Robert Aldrich, Robert Ryan, Sunil Patel, Telly Savalas, war, year of the month

About the Author

Sam “Burgundy Suit” Scott

Sam is a features writer for Looper and studied writing under Kevin Wilson at Sewanee: the University of the South. He’s been a staff writer for The Solute since its launch in 2014 and editor of the Year of the Month series since 2017.

I don’t know how to put this, but he’s kind of a big deal. He has many leather-bound books and his apartment smells of rich mahogany.

Now on Patreon!
https://www.patreon.com/user/creators?u=23744950

  • Tumblr
  • Twitter

Related Posts

Of course he couldn't kill it!Disney Byways: “Little Hiawatha”→

Not featuring Walt's floating headDisney Byways: THE ACADEMY AWARD REVIEW OF WALT DISNEY CARTOONS→

Your hat, sir!Disney Byways: “Modern Inventions”→

Year of the Month: DRY SUMMER (SUSUZ YAZ)→

  • Comments
  • Popular
  • Most Recent
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleWonderful piece, Sam. It's made…
  • j*****@yahoo.com'
    mr_apollo on Year of the Month: Mon OncleFellow heretic here. I've never…
  • n***********@gmail.com'
    Ruck Cohlchez on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEI wouldn't have called it…
  • j***********@gmail.com'
    Son of Griff on LIFE ITSELFGlad to hear back from…
  • n*********@gmail.com'
    Jake Gittes on Film on the Internet: AN AMERICAN CRIMEThis is the single most…
  • “The End” of SAVAGES

    33911 views / Posted November 10, 2014
  • What the fuck did I just watch? SPHERE

    27470 views / Posted March 19, 2015
  • The Untalented Mr. Ripley: The Craft of Standup Comedy and the Non-Comedy of TOM MYERS

    25111 views / Posted June 26, 2018
  • Scenic Routes: SHOWGIRLS (1995)

    20113 views / Posted November 20, 2014
  • Yvonne, or: CASABLANCA In One Character and Three Scenes

    11160 views / Posted August 21, 2014
  • Disney Byways: Disney’s Lawyers

    March 31, 2023 / Gillianren
  • The Solute Book Club: THE DAUGHTER OF TIME (by Casper)

    March 31, 2023 / The Ploughman
  • You've got something dangling... no the other...

    The Friday Article Roundup: Plain as the Nose

    March 31, 2023 / The Ploughman
  • A feminist icon?

    SUPER MARIO BROS. 1993 and the Rise of Feminism: An Intersectional Femivision article by Cori Domschot

    March 30, 2023 / Gillianren
  • Pet rocks dropped in popularity when H.R. Giger redesigned them.

    Miller’s 2022 Double Features: Wake Up and Live, Eat Shit and Die

    March 30, 2023 / The Ploughman

Last Tweets

  • Disney Byways: Disney’s Lawyers - https://t.co/9rI8TOYL9X, 5 hours ago
  • The Solute Book Club: Join us for a discussion on Josephine Tey's THE DAUGHTER OF TIME: https://t.co/XUHS1frzrf, 15 hours ago
  • The Friday Article Roundup: Plain as the Nose - https://t.co/tXiXDvwe4f, 17 hours ago

©2014 - 2016 The-Solute | Hosted, Developed and Maintained by Bellingham WP LogoBellinghamWP.com.

Menu

  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us
  • Login
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!